Case Report
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2014; 20(16): 4822-4826
Published online Apr 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4822
Figure 1
Figure 1 Preoperative abdominal computed tomography findings. “Target sign”, which can be shown from intussusception, was identified in the terminal ileum (black arrow). A: Horizontal plane; B: Coronal plane.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Intraoperative findings. A: The appendix was attached to the terminal ileum and a firm mass was palpable within the terminal ileum (ileocecal valve, black arrow; appendiceal tip, black arrowhead; palpable mass, white arrow); B: The appendix base was divided and dissection was performed to the lesion to the entry of the appendiceal tip into the terminal ileum (entry site, black arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Postoperative gross findings. A: The polyp size was 3.5 cm × 3.0 cm; B, C: The appendiceal tip was continuous from external to the ileum into the ileal lumen; D: Tissue cross section revealed that the appendix penetrated into the polyp inside the ileum. The appendiceal lumen was identified within the ileum (black arrow).
Figure 4
Figure 4 Histopathologic findings (hematoxylin and eosin staining). A: It was shown hyperplastic epithelium. But there was no dysplasia (× 40); B: Demonstrating the arborizing pattern of smooth-muscle proliferation (white arrow). And these smooth muscle bundles were originated from the muscularis mucosa (× 100).