Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2012; 18(48): 7271-7278
Published online Dec 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7271
Figure 1
Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry staining of high mobility group protein box 1 in the jejunum (A), ileum (B), liver (C), kidney (D) and lung (E) (n = 8). I/R + D: Ischemia/reperfusion and drainage; I/R: Ischemia/reperfusion. Images shown at 100× magnification (A and B) and 200× magnification (C, D and E).
Figure 2
Figure 2 Expression levels of high mobility group protein box 1 protein in the jejunum and ileum (n = 8). Top: Western blotting analysis of high mobility group protein box 1 (HMGB1) in the jejunum (left) and ileum (right). Lane 1: Blank; Lane 2: Sham; Lane 3: I/R + D; Lane 4: I/R; Bottom: Quantification of HMGB1 protein levels in the jejunum (left) and ileum (right). HMGB1 levels were normalized to the levels of the β-actin internal control. aP < 0.05 vs the blank group; cP < 0.05 vs the sham group; eP < 0.05 vs the I/R group. I/R + D: Ischemia/reperfusion and drainage; I/R: Ischemia/reperfusion.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Expression levels of high mobility group protein box 1 in the liver, lung, and kidney (n = 8). Top: Western blotting analysis of high mobility group protein box 1 (HMGB1) in the liver (left), lung (middle), and kidney (right). Lane 1: Blank; Lane 2: Sham; Lane 3: I/R + D; Lane 4: I/R; Bottom: Quantification of HMGB1 protein levels in the liver (left), lung (middle), and kidney (right). HMGB1 levels were normalized to the levels of the β-actin internal control. aP < 0.05 vs the blank group; cP < 0.05 vs the sham group; eP < 0.05 vs the I/R group. I/R + D: Ischemia/reperfusion and drainage; I/R: Ischemia/reperfusion.