Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2012; 18(16): 1926-1932
Published online Apr 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1926
Published online Apr 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1926
Figure 1 Cumulative survival rates by Kaplan-Meier method in elderly (n = 74, thin line) and non-elderly groups (n = 212, thick line).
Figure 2 Cumulative survival rates by Kaplan-Meier method in each modified Japan Integrated Stage score group in elderly and non-elderly patients are shown.
A: Elderly patients; B: Non-elderly patients.
Figure 3 The analysis of the survival rate with modified Japan Integrated Stage score two points or less.
A: Cumulative survival rates by Kaplan-Meier method in elderly (n = 47, thick line) and non-elderly groups(n = 136, thin line) whose modified Japan Integrated Stage (mJIS) score is two points or less; B: Cumulative survival rates by Kaplan-Meier method in 75-80 year-olds (n = 25, thick line), 80 years old or more (n = 22, thin line) and non-elderly groups (n = 136, dotted line) whose mJIS score is two points or less are shown.
- Citation: Fujii H, Itoh Y, Ohnishi N, Sakamoto M, Ohkawara T, Sawa Y, Nishida K, Ohkawara Y, Yamaguchi K, Minami M, Okanoue T. Factors associated with the overall survival of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(16): 1926-1932
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i16/1926.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1926