Basic Research
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2007; 13(4): 538-547
Published online Jan 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i4.538
Figure 1
Figure 1 Mean contraction of longitudinal ileum muscle isolated from sham-operated control, I/R control, CPA-I/R, adenosine-I/R, and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R rats in response to 30 mmol/L KCl. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 8). aP < 0.05 vs sham-operated control group.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Representative traces showing responses generated by various concentrations of carbachol in longitudinal ileum muscle isolated from sham-operated control (A), I/R control (B), CPA–I/R (C), adenosine-I/R (D), and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R (E) rats.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Dose-response curves of carbachol in longitudinal ileum muscle isolated from sham-operated control, I/R control, CPA-I/R, adenosine-I/R, and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R rats. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 8). aP < 0.05 vs sham-operated control, cP < 0.05 vs I/R control groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Representative traces showing responses generated by various concentrations of substance P in longitudinal ileum muscle isolated from sham-operated control (A), I/R control (B), CPA-I/R (C), adenosine-I/R (D), and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R (E) rats.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Dose-response curves of substance P in longitudinal ileum muscle isolated from sham-operated control, I/R control, CPA-I/R, adenosine-I/R, and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R rats. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 8). aP < 0.05 vs sham-operated control, cP < 0.05 vs I/R control groups.
Figure 6
Figure 6 TBARS content of ileum samples from sham-operated control, I/R control, CPA-I/R, adenosine-I/R, and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R rats. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 8). aP < 0.05 vs sham-operated control, cP < 0.05 vs I/R control groups.
Figure 7
Figure 7 GSH content of ileum samples from sham-operated control, I/R control, CPA-I/R, adenosine-I/R, and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R rats. Data are expressed as means ± SE (n = 8). aP < 0.05 vs sham-operated control, cP < 0.05 vs I/R control groups.
Figure 8
Figure 8 MPO level of ileum samples from sham-operated control, I/R control, CPA-I/R, adenosine-I/R, and DPCPX-adenosine-I/R animals. Results are the means ± SE of 6 to 8 animals in each group. aP < 0.05 vs I/R control, bP < 0.001 vs sham-operated control.