Basic Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. May 1, 2004; 10(9): 1315-1320
Published online May 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i9.1315
Figure 1
Figure 1 Histopathological findings of representative liver sections from female rats treated with CCl4. VG staining, original magnification ×100. A: Control group; B: Ovx+CCl4 group; C: Ovx + CCl4 + β-Est group.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Immunohistochemistry of α-SMA in representative liver sections from female rats treated with CCl4, DAB staining. A: control group, original magnification ×200; B: Ovx + CCl4 group, original magnification × 400; C: Ovx + CCl4 + β-Est group, original magnification ×400.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Histopathological and immunohistochemical changes in CCl4-treated female rats (fibrotic area percentage of total field), aP<0. 05 vs CCl4; bP<0.01 vs control.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Serum estradiol levels in CCl4–treated female rats, bP<0. 01 vs control, dP<0.01 vs CCl4.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Negative correlation between fibrotic area percentage and serum estradiol level (r = 0. 57, P < 0.01).
Figure 6
Figure 6 Effects of estradiol metabolites on function of HSCs proliferation (A), HA (B) and C IV (C) secretion in HSCs, effects of 10-7 mol/L estradiol metabolites on α-SMA expression (D) of HSCs. Values for each point represent mean ± SD from 5 separate experiments, aP < 0.05 vs control, dP < 0.05 vs 10-7 mol/L β-Est.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Representative immunohistochemistry showing expression of ER on HSCs used for studies, original magnification ×200. No expression of ER-α(A) but ER-β(B) was observed.