Liver Cancer
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 15, 2003; 9(6): 1212-1215
Published online Jun 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i6.1212
Changes in survival patterns in urban Chinese patients with liver cancer
Xi-Shan Hao, Ke-Xin Chen, Peizhong Peter Wang, Tom Rohan
Xi-Shan Hao, Ke-Xin Chen, Tianjin Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China
Peizhong Peter Wang, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Tom Rohan, Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, U.S.A
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. P. Peter Wang, ACREU, Toronto Western Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, MP 10-327, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada. wang@uhnres.utoronto.ca
Telephone: +1-416-603-5800 Ext: 3174 Fax: +1-416-603-6288
Received: February 26, 2003
Revised: March 4, 2003
Accepted: March 16, 2003
Published online: June 15, 2003
Abstract

AIM: To examine the survival patterns and determinants of primary liver cancer in a geographically defined Chinese population.

METHODS: Primary liver cancer cases (n = 13685) diagnosed between 1981 and 2000 were identified by the Tianjin Cancer Registry. Age-adjusted and age-specific incidence rates were examined in both males and females. Proportional hazards (Cox) regression was utilized to explore the effects of time of diagnosis, sex, age, occupation, residence, and hospital of diagnosis on survival.

RESULTS: Crude and age-adjusted incidence rates in the study period were: 27.4/100000 and 26.3/100000 in males; and 11.5/100000 and 10.4/100000 in females, respectively. Cox regression analyses indicated that there was a significant improvement in survival rates over time. Industrial workers and older people had relatively poor survival rates. The hospital in which the liver cancer was diagnosed was a statistically significant predictor of survival; patients diagnosed in city hospitals were more likely to have better survival than those diagnosed in community/district hospitals.

CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed in recent years appeared to have a better outcome than those diagnosed in early times. There were also significant survival disparities with respect to occupation and hospital of diagnosis, which suggest that socioeconomic status may play an important role in determining prognosis.

Keywords: $[Keywords]