Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2002. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 15, 2002; 8(5): 956-960
Published online Oct 15, 2002. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i5.956
Combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation: Case report
Wei-Jie Zhang, Dun-Gui Liu, Qi-Fa Ye, Bo Sha, Fan-Jun Zhen, Hui Guo, Sui-Sheng Xia
Wei-Jie Zhang, Dun-Gui Liu, Qi-Fa Ye, Bo Sha, Fan-Jun Zhen, Hui Guo, Sui-Sheng Xia, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Wei-Jie Zhang, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, 1095 Jie Fang Da Dao, Wuhan 430030, China. wjzhang@public.wh.hb.cn
Telephone: +86-27-83662655 Fax: +86-27-83662892
Received: May 31, 2001
Revised: September 15, 2001
Accepted: September 22, 2001
Published online: October 15, 2002
Abstract

AIM: To present a case of combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation.

METHODS: A 55-year-old patient with short bowel syndrome and TPN-related liver dysfunction received small bowel transplantation combined with a reduced auxiliary liver graft. A liver was added to restore the patient's liver function and to protect the intestinal allograft from rejection. His own liver was not removed.

RESULTS: Without donor pretreatment and by conventional immunosuppresive therapy following transplantation, the patient experienced had only one episode of mild intestinal rejection, which was easily reversed by treatment with Methylprednisolone. No liver rejection occurred. Unfortunately, the patient died of heart and lung failure 30 d after transplantation, despite successful graft replacement. Histopathologic examination of specimens after death demonstrated normal structure in both intestinal and liver grafts.

CONCLUSION: The auxiliary liver graft might play a role in preventing intestinal allograft rejection. However, the observation period in this case is short. Further study is needed to determine the risks, effect on the protecting the small-bowel from rejection, and feasibility of general application of this procedure.

Keywords: $[Keywords]