BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2026; 32(45): 121242
Published online Dec 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121242
Domain specific training with three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy images improves artificial intelligence based automated size prediction for large lesions
Dominik Schulz, Alanna Ebigbo, Eva Holley, Sandra Nagl, Olga Nichiporyk, Andreas Probst, Markus W Scheppach, Christoph Römmele, David Roser, Stephan Zellmer, Helmut Messmann
Dominik Schulz, Eva Holley, Sandra Nagl, Andreas Probst, Markus W Scheppach, Christoph Römmele, David Roser, Stephan Zellmer, Helmut Messmann, III. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg 86156, Germany
Alanna Ebigbo, Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum St. Josef-Hospital, Bochum 44791, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Olga Nichiporyk, Institut für Transfusionsmedizin und Hämostaseologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg 86156, Germany
Author contributions: Schulz D designed and conducted the research study, wrote the original draft; Ebigbo A, Holley E, Nagl S, Nichiporyk O, Probst A, and Zellmer S provided size estimations; Messmann H provided funding acquisition; Schulz D, Ebigbo A, Holley E, Nagl S, Nichiporyk O, Probst A, Scheppach MW, Römmele C, Roser D, Zellmer S, and Messmann H reviewed and edited the manuscript; all of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
AI contribution statement: During the preparation of this work the main author used Gemini 3 in order to refine some of the paragraphs for proper journal english. After using this tool/service, the main author reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the published article.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee, No. 25-4152-104.
Informed consent statement: The data used in this study were originally collected during routine clinical care, and the analysis was performed exclusively within the institution in compliance with applicable data protection regulations. According to Article 27(4) of the Bavarian Hospital Act (Bayerisches Krankenhausgesetz, BayKrG), individual patient consent is not required for internal retrospective analyses conducted for quality assurance or scientific evaluation within the hospital. Therefore, the study was carried out without obtaining separate informed consent from each patient.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Ebigbo A reports consultancy fees from Ambu and Olympus. Römmele C reports consultancy fees from Ambu Innovations and Ambu GmbH, and unpaid consultancy for Boston Scientific. Messmann H reports relationships with Ambu, Boston Scientific, Fujifilm, Hitachi, and Olympus; has received honoraria from Olympus, and hasreceived consultation fees from Ambu, Boston Scientific, and Olympus. Schulz D, Holley E, Nagl S, Nichiporyk O, Probst A, Scheppach MW, Roser D, and Zellmer S declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to legal restrictions under the General Data Protection Regulation and the Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG). Data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, provided that access is consistent with the original consent of the participants, approved by the responsible ethics committee, and subject to a formal data use agreement in accordance with applicable data protection regulations.
Corresponding author: Dominik Schulz, Senior Scientist, III. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, Augsburg 86156, Germany. dominik.schulz@uk-augsburg.de
Received: March 19, 2026
Revised: May 18, 2026
Accepted: July 3, 2026
Published online: December 7, 2026
Processing time: 210 Days and 12.6 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Accurate measurement of the lesion size in colonoscopy is important for selecting the guideline-recommended resection methods and surveillance intervals. The commonly applied technique of visual size estimation by endoscopists can be inaccurate by up to 66%.

AIM

To develop, use, and compare artificial intelligence-based methods to improve size estimation.

METHODS

We used three state-of-the-art monocular depth estimation models. Furthermore, one model was fine-tuned by domain-specific training with 3060 white-light-rendered images and depth maps of a virtual colonoscopy through a three-dimensional colon model. We evaluated the models using single white-light images obtained from two independent cohorts: (1) One internal cohort of 133 patients who received an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (mean lesion diameter 31.4 mm); and (2) One external cohort of 42 patients with polyps (mean diameter 5.2 mm) receiving a snare-assisted polypectomy. The gold standard for size estimation was caliper measurement of the lesions after removal. We analyzed the absolute diameter and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline conform predefined size bins as an outcome parameters. For comparison in the ESD cohort, three expert and three trainee endoscopists estimated the lesion size.

RESULTS

The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) in the ESD cohort for the three models ranged from 68.3% to 77.0%. The fine-tuned model reached a MAPE of 37.0%. The experts and trainees achieved 27.3% and 37.5%, respectively. In the external cohort, the MAPE of the three models ranged from 37.6% to 102.4%, while the fine-tuned model achieved the best result with 33.9%.

CONCLUSION

While monocular depth estimation holds potential for automating polyp size prediction, bigger lesions pose an additional challenge and require rigorous domain-specific training using methods such as three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy.

Keywords: Polyp size; Lesion size; Colonoscopy; Artificial intelligence; Monocular depth estimation

Core Tip: Accurate measurement of colorectal polyp size is mandatory influencing the choice of resection technique and surveillance intervals. However, conventional visual estimation by endoscopists is prone to significant error rates up to 66%. In this work, we compare three state-of-the art monocular depth estimation artificial intelligence models for automated size measurement. When applied natively to colonoscopy, they show poor accuracy in size prediction. By domain specific training using virtual colonoscopy images we could significantly improve size prediction. The fine-tuned model achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 33.9%-37.0%. This performance was comparable to trainee endoscopists but remained inferior to experts.

Write to the Help Desk