BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Correspondence
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2026; 32(42): 123964
Published online Nov 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.123964
Letter to the Editor: Rhubarb enema for acute pancreatitis - encouraging gut-immune signals with unconfirmed clinical benefit
Sheng-Yu Huang, Xing-Wei Zhao, Qiu-Ting Li, Zi-Xu Ye, Chun-Xiang Zhang
Sheng-Yu Huang, Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China
Xing-Wei Zhao, Qiu-Ting Li, Key Laboratory of Medical Electrophysiology, Ministry of Education & Medical Electrophysiological Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China
Zi-Xu Ye, Clinical Medical College, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China
Chun-Xiang Zhang, Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China
Co-first authors: Sheng-Yu Huang and Xing-Wei Zhao.
Author contributions: Huang SY and Zhao XW contributed equally to this study as co-first authors; Zhang CX was responsible for study conception and manuscript preparation; Huang SY, Zhao XW, Li QT, and Ye ZX were responsible for manuscript preparation.
AI contribution statement: This manuscript did not use generative AI.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors have no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.
Corresponding author: Chun-Xiang Zhang, Dean, Professor, Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 1 Section 1, Xianglin Road, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China. zcxteam@163.com
Received: June 2, 2026
Revised: June 27, 2026
Accepted: July 13, 2026
Published online: November 14, 2026
Processing time: 112 Days and 11.8 Hours
Abstract

Progress in acute pancreatitis management has mainly resulted from improvements in supportive care, while adjunctive therapies targeting intestinal function and immune-inflammatory responses remain unproven. In the recent issue of World Journal of Gastroenterology, Zhong et al conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating rhubarb enema in acute pancreatitis. The intervention reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines, downregulated the Th17 cell/IL-17A pathway, increased interleukin-10 levels, and was associated with lower intra-abdominal pressure, collectively supporting the possibility that gut-directed interventions may influence systemic inflammation through modulation of the gut-immune axis. However, 28-day all-cause mortality was not significantly reduced, and the observed number of deaths was substantially lower than anticipated, reducing statistical power and increasing the risk of a type II error. Furthermore, the predominance of hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis limits generalizability. Rhubarb enema should therefore be regarded as a promising but unconfirmed adjunctive intervention requiring validation in studies focused on patient-centered outcomes.

Keywords: Acute pancreatitis; Rhubarb enema; Gut-immune axis; Th17 cells; IL-17A; Intra-abdominal pressure; Randomized controlled trial; Patient-centered outcomes

Core Tip: Rhubarb enema has shown promising intestinal-immune regulatory signals in acute pancreatitis, including a decrease in pro-inflammatory factors, a downregulation of the Th17/IL-17A pathway, an increase in IL-10, and an improvement in intra-abdominal pressure. However, recent randomized controlled studies have not shown a significant reduction in all-cause mortality at 28 days, and the actual event rate is lower than expected, with a relatively specific study population, which limits the certainty and generalizability of the conclusions. Rhubarb enema should currently be regarded as a potentially promising but unproven adjunctive intervention rather than a standard treatment that can immediately change clinical practice. Its clinical value still needs to be further verified in standardized procedures, clear stratified populations, and patient-centered hard endpoints.

Write to the Help Desk