Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2025; 31(24): 108298
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i24.108298
Real-world comparison of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without immunotherapy as first-line therapy in colorectal cancer
Zhao Gao, Xiao-Yan Wang, Zhi-Gang Shen, Jia-Hua Liu, Xiao-Yun Wang, Shi-Kai Wu, Xuan Jin
Zhao Gao, Xiao-Yun Wang, Shi-Kai Wu, Xuan Jin, Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
Xiao-Yan Wang, Zhi-Gang Shen, Jia-Hua Liu, Department of Pharmacy, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China
Author contributions: Gao Z and Wang XY collected data; Gao Z and Wang XY wrote the manuscript; Gao Z, Shen ZG, Liu JH, Wang XY, and Wu SK analyzed the data; Wu SK and Jin X conceived of the review and edited the manuscript; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Supported by the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Multi-Center Clinical Research Project of Peking University First Hospital), No. 2022CR65.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital, approval No. 2025R0190-0001; and Jilin Cancer Hospital, approval No. 202501-003-01.
Informed consent statement: The informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xuan Jin, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Beijing 100034, China. jinxuanbdyy@outlook.com
Received: April 10, 2025
Revised: May 8, 2025
Accepted: June 11, 2025
Published online: June 28, 2025
Processing time: 77 Days and 14.1 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is characterized by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, leading to limited efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients. Clinical trial data suggest that chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy may have the potential to enhance the response to immunotherapy in these patients. However, whether these research findings can be “replicated” in clinical practice still requires further validation through real-world studies. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab with or without anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy as the first-line regimen for MSS mCRC in the real world.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab with or without anti-PD-1 immunotherapy as the first-line regimen for MSS mCRC in the real world.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MSS mCRC diagnosed at Peking University First Hospital and Jilin Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients were stratified into two treatment groups: (1) An experimental group receiving first-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy; and (2) A control group receiving chemotherapy plus bevacizumab alone. Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics, including age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, number of metastatic sites, and primary tumor location. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, while secondary endpoints included disease control rate, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing. Additionally, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied for sensitivity analysis to validate the robustness of our findings.

RESULTS

The propensity score matching analysis identified 103 well-balanced patient pairs with a median follow-up of 25.5 months. The experimental group demonstrated numerically higher objective response (36.00% vs 23.08%, P = 0.309) and disease control rates (96.00% vs 91.03%, P = 0.6759) compared to the control group, though these differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, no significant survival benefit was observed for either progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.7076, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4069-1.23, P = 0.22] or overall survival (HR = 1.154, 95%CI: 0.4712-2.827, P = 0.75). Multivariate analysis identified liver metastases as an independent poor prognostic factor (HR = 3.36, 95%CI: 1.71-6.60, P < 0.001), while subgroup analyses revealed potential benefits of the experimental regimen in male patients (HR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.14-0.81, P = 0.025) and those with right-sided primary tumors (HR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.17-0.95, P = 0.022). Safety profiles were comparable between groups, though elevated lactate dehydrogenase emerged as an independent risk factor for poorer outcomes in the experimental group (HR = 4.11, 95%CI: 1.02-16.55, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy could not demonstrate promising efficacy in treating MSS mCRC compared to the standard first-line chemotherapy regimen with bevacizumab. Male patients or those with right-sided mCRC may derive benefits from immune-based combination therapy. Further research is needed to investigate specific clinical characteristics or biomarkers to identify patients who may derive benefit from combined immunotherapy approaches.

Keywords: Microsatellite stable; RAS mutation; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Programmed death 1

Core Tip: Patients with microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer typically exhibit an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and demonstrate a low response rate to immunotherapy. Clinical trial data suggest that chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy may have the potential to enhance the response to immunotherapy in these patients. However, whether these research findings can be “replicated” in clinical practice still requires further validation through real-world studies. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab with or without anti-programmed death 1 immunotherapy as the first-line regimen for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer in the real world.