Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2019; 25(24): 3079-3090
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3079
Evaluation of clinical outcomes in an interdisciplinary abdominal pain clinic: A retrospective, exploratory review
Amanda D Deacy, Craig A Friesen, Vincent S Staggs, Jennifer V Schurman
Amanda D Deacy, Craig A Friesen, Jennifer V Schurman, Division of Gastroenterology, Children’s Mercy Kansas City; UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States
Amanda D Deacy, Jennifer V Schurman, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Sciences, Children’s Mercy Kansas City; UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States
Vincent S Staggs, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children’s Mercy Kansas City; UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States
Author contributions: Deacy AD, Friesen CA, and Schurman JV contributed to study conception and design; Deacy AD and Staggs VS contributed to data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, and writing of article; Deacy AD, Friesen CA, Staggs VS, and Schurman JV contributed to editing, reviewing and final approval of article.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Children's Mercy Hospital Pediatric Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent statement: Waivers of permission/assent and consent were deemed appropriate for this study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: None to declare.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE statement – checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement – checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Amanda D Deacy, PhD, Associate Professor, Psychologist, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Sciences, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States. addeacy@cmh.edu
Telephone: +1-816-302-3042 Fax: +1-816-234-1553
Received: March 30, 2019
Peer-review started: April 1, 2019
First decision: May 9, 2019
Revised: May 21, 2019
Accepted: May 31, 2019
Article in press: June 2, 2019
Published online: June 28, 2019
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common and well-accepted to be etiologically complex in terms of the contribution of biological, psychological, and social factors to symptom presentations. Nonetheless, despite its documented benefits, interdisciplinary treatment, designed to address all of these factors, for pediatric FGIDs remains rare. The current study hypothesized that the majority of pediatric patients seen in an interdisciplinary abdominal pain clinic (APC) would demonstrate clinical resolution of symptoms during the study period and that specific psychosocial variables would be significantly predictive of GI symptom improvement.

AIM

To evaluate outcomes with interdisciplinary treatment in pediatric patients with pain-related FGIDs and identify patient characteristics that predicted clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Participants were 392 children, ages 8-18 [M = 13.8; standard deviation (SD) = 2.7], seen between August 1, 2013 and June 15, 2016 in an interdisciplinary APC housed within the Division of Gastroenterology in a medium-sized Midwestern children’s hospital. To be eligible, patients had to be 8 years of age or older and have had abdominal pain for ≥ 8 wk at the time of initial evaluation. Medical and psychosocial data collected as part of standard of care were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed in the context of the observational study. Logistic regression was used to model odds of reporting vs never reporting improvement, as well as to differentiate rapid from slower improvers.

RESULTS

Nearly 70% of patients followed during the study period achieved resolution on at least one of the employed outcome indices. Among those who achieved resolution during follow up, 43% to 49% did so by the first follow up (i.e., within roughly 2 mo after initial evaluation and initiation of interdisciplinary treatment). Patient age, sleep, ease of relaxation, and depression all significantly predicted the likelihood of resolution. More specifically, the odds of clinical resolution were 14% to 16% lower per additional year of patient age (P < 0.001 to P = 0.016). The odds of resolution were 28% to 42% lower per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase on a pediatric sleep measure (P = 0.006 to P < 0.040). Additionally, odds of clinical resolution were 58% lower per 1-SD increase on parent-reported measure of depression (P = 0.006), and doubled in cases where parents agreed that their children found it easy to relax (P = 0.045). Furthermore, sleep predicted the rapidity of clinical resolution; that is, the odds of achieving resolution by the first follow up visit were 47% to 60% lower per 1-SD increase on the pediatric sleep measure (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Outcomes for youth with FGIDs may be significantly improved by paying specific attention to sleep, ensuring adequate skills for relaxation, and screening of and referral for treatment of comorbid depression.

Keywords: Pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders, Integrated care, Behavioral health consultation, Treatment outcomes, Abdominal pain clinic

Core tip: Naturalistic data collection as part of standard of care in an interdisciplinary specialty clinic allows for early identification of psychosocial factors that complicate the course of pediatrics functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), thereby allowing for proactive intervention. The current study demonstrates that outcomes for youth with FGIDs may be significantly improved by paying specific attention to sleep, ensuring adequate skills for relaxation, and screening of and referral for treatment of comorbid depression.