Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2013; 19(26): 4172-4176
Published online Jul 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4172
Single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement
Askin Erdogan
Askin Erdogan, Department of Gastroenterology, Baskent University, Alanya Research and Teaching Center, 07400 Alanya, Turkey
Author contributions: Erdogan A designed the research, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Askin Erdogan, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Baskent University, Alanya Research and Teaching Center, Saray m, Kizlarpinari cd 1, 07400 Antalya, Turkey.
Telephone: +90-242-5112511 Fax: +90-242-5115563
Received: September 16, 2012
Revised: December 17, 2012
Accepted: January 5, 2013
Published online: July 14, 2013

AIM: To investigate whether single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is safe and to compare the complications of PEG with those reported in the literature.

METHODS: Patients who underwent PEG placement between June 2001 and August 2011 at the Baskent University Alanya Teaching and Research Center were evaluated retrospectively. Patients whose PEG was placed for the first time by a single endoscopist were enrolled in the study. PEG was performed using the pull method. All of the patients were evaluated for their indications for PEG, major and minor complications resulting from PEG, nutritional status, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the use of antibiotic treatment or antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PEG. Comorbidities, rates, time and reasons for mortality were also evaluated. The reasons for PEG removal and PEG duration were also investigated.

RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent the PEG procedure for the first time during this study. Eight patients who underwent PEG placement by 2 endoscopists were not enrolled in the study. A total of 54 patients were investigated. The patients’ mean age was 69.9 years. The most common indication for PEG was cerebral infarct, which occurred in approximately two-thirds of the patients. The mean albumin level was 3.04 ± 0.7 g/dL, and 76.2% of the patients’ albumin levels were below the normal values. The mean CRP level was high in 90.6% of patients prior to the procedure. Approximately two-thirds of the patients received antibiotics for either prophylaxis or treatment for infections prior to the PEG procedure. Mortality was not related to the procedure in any of the patients. Buried bumper syndrome was the only major complication, and it occurred in the third year. In such case, the PEG was removed and a new PEG tube was placed via surgery. Eight patients (15.1%) experienced minor complications, 6 (11.1%) of which were wound infections. All wound infections except one recovered with antibiotic treatment. Two patients had bleeding from the PEG site, one was resolved with primary suturing and the other with fresh frozen plasma transfusion.

CONCLUSION: The incidence of major and minor complications is in keeping with literature. This finding may be noteworthy, especially in developing countries.

Keywords: Gastrostomy, Gastric feeding tube, Enteral nutrition, Enteral feeding, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal