Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2013; 19(13): 2053-2059
Published online Apr 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i13.2053
Noninvasive methods for prediction of esophageal varices in pediatric patients with portal hypertension
Marina Rossato Adami, Cristina Targa Ferreira, Carlos Oscar Kieling, Vania Hirakata, Sandra Maria Gonçalves Vieira
Marina Rossato Adami, Cristina Targa Ferreira, Carlos Oscar Kieling, Vania Hirakata, Sandra Maria Gonçalves Vieira, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Post-Graduation in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 91350-170, Brazil
Author contributions: Adami MR, Ferreira CT, Kieling CO, Vieira SMG designed the research; Adami MR, Kieling CO performed the research; Adami MR, Kieling CO, Hirakata V analyzed the data; Adami MR, Ferreira CT, Kieling CO, Hirakata V, Vieira SMG wrote the paper.
Supported by FIPE-HCPA (Research and Events Support Fund at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre)
Correspondence to: Dr. Marina Rossato Adami, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Post-Graduation in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 91350-170, Brasil. marinaadami2008@gmail.com
Telephone: +55-51-99613460 Fax: +55-51-99613460
Received: September 14, 2012
Revised: December 25, 2012
Accepted: January 11, 2013
Published online: April 7, 2013
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate clinical and laboratory parameters for prediction of bleeding from esophageal varices (EV) in children with portal hypertension.

METHODS: Retrospective study of 103 children (mean age: 10.1 ± 7.7 years), 95.1% with intrahepatic portal hypertension. All patients had no history of bleeding and underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy for EV screening. We recorded variceal size (F1, F2 and F3), red-color signs and portal gastropathy, according to the Japanese Research Society for Portal Hypertension classification. Patients were classified into two groups: with and without EV. Seven noninvasive markers were evaluated as potential predictors of EV: (1) platelet count; (2) spleen size z score, expressed as a standard deviation score relative to normal values for age; (3) platelet count to spleen size z score ratio; (4) platelets count to spleen size (cm) ratio; (5) the clinical prediction rule (CPR); (6) the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI); and (7) the risk score.

RESULTS: Seventy-one children had EV on first endoscopy. On univariate analysis, spleen size, platelets, CPR, risk score, APRI, and platelet count to spleen size z score ratio showed significant associations. The best noninvasive predictors of EV were platelet count [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.82; 95%CI: 0.73-0.91], platelet: spleen size z score (AUROC 0.78; 95%CI: 0.67-0.88), CPR (AUROC 0.77; 95%CI: 0.64-0.89), and risk score (AUROC 0.77; 95%CI: 0.66-0.88). A logistic regression model was applied with EV as the dependent variable and corrected by albumin, bilirubin and spleen size z score. Children with a CPR < 114 were 20.7-fold more likely to have EV compared to children with CPR > 114. A risk score > -1.2 increased the likelihood of EV (odds ratio 7.47; 95%CI: 2.06-26.99).

CONCLUSION: Children with portal hypertension with a CPR below 114 and a risk score greater than -1.2 are more likely to have present EV. Therefore, these two tests can be helpful in selecting children for endoscopy.

Keywords: Portal hypertension, Clinical predictors, Pediatric patients, Esophageal varices

Core tip: Children with portal hypertension (PH) are at risk for variceal bleeding. The standard test for screening varices is endoscopy, an invasive method. We evaluated non-invasive markers for diagnosing esophageal varices (EV) in 103 children (95% intrahepatic PH). All patients had no bleeding history and underwent endoscopy for EV screening. Platelet count (< 115 000), clinical prediction rule (< 114) and risk score (cutoff > -1.2) were the best predictors of EV. Limitations are the retrospective design and the small number of pre-hepatic PH patients. The strength is the paucity of pediatric studies related to this issue and the assessment of risk score in children.