Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2013; 19(1): 65-71
Published online Jan 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.65
Prolonged QT dispersion in inflammatory bowel disease
Elif Yorulmaz, Aslıhan Sezgin, Hatice Yorulmaz, Gupse Adali, Hilmi Ciftci
Elif Yorulmaz, Gupse Adali, Department of Gastroenterology, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, 34470 Istanbul, Turkey
Aslıhan Sezgin, Hilmi Ciftci, Department of III Internal Medicine, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, 34470 Istanbul, Turkey
Hatice Yorulmaz, School of Nursing, Halic University, 34394 Istanbul, Turkey
Author contributions: Yorulmaz E and Adali G collected material and wrote the manuscript; Sezgin A and Ciftci H provided evaluating data; Yorulmaz H was involved in editing the manuscript and statistical analysis.
Correspondence to: Hatice Yorulmaz, Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Halic University, Buyukdere Street. No.101, Mecidiyeköy, 34394 Istanbul, Turkey. haticeyorulmaz@hotmail.com
Telephone: +90-212-2752020 Fax: +90-212-5264917
Received: July 7, 2011
Revised: April 13, 2012
Accepted: August 15, 2012
Published online: January 7, 2013
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the frequency and factors of prolonged QT dispersion that may lead to severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS: This study included 63 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 41 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. Forty-seven healthy patients were included as the control group. Heart rate was calculated using electrocardiography, corrected QT dispersion (QTcd) and the Bazett’s formula. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) was used to determine insulin resistance (IR). HOMA values < 1 were considered normal and values > 2.5 indicated a high probability of IR.

RESULTS: Prolonged QTcd was found in 12.2% of UC patients, and in 14.5% of CD patients compared with the control group (P < 0.05). A significant difference was found between the insulin values (CD: 10.95 ± 6.10 vs 6.44 ± 3.28, P < 0.05; UC: 10.88 ± 7.19 vs 7.20 ± 4.54, P < 0.05) and HOMA (CD: 2.56 ± 1.43 vs 1.42 ± 0.75, P < 0.05; UC: 2.94 ± 1.88 vs 1.90 ± 1.09, P < 0.05) in UC and CD patients with and without prolonged QTcd. Disease behavior types were determined in CD patients with prolonged QTcd. Increased systolic arterial pressure (125 ± 13.81 vs 114.09 ± 8.73, P < 0.01) and age (48.67 ± 13.93 vs 39.57 ± 11.58, P < 0.05) in UC patients were significantly associated with prolonged QTcd.

CONCLUSION: Our data show that IBD patients have prolonged QTcd in relation to controls. The routine follow-up of IBD patients should include determination of HOMA, insulin values and electrocardiogram examination.

Keywords: Crohn’s disease, Homeostasis model assessment, Insulin, QT dispersion, Ulcerative colitis