Review
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2012; 18(39): 5521-5532
Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5521
Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: Controversies and questions
Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Suthinee Ithimakin, Martin R Weiser
Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Martin R Weiser, Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Suthinee Ithimakin, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Author contributions: Trakarnsanga A and Ithimakin S wrote the manuscript; Weiser MR critically revised the manuscript and oversaw intellectual content.
Correspondence to: Martin R Weiser, MD, Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Room C-1075, New York, NY 10065, United States. weiser1@mskcc.org
Telephone: +1-212-6396698 Fax: +1-212-7943198
Received: January 31, 2012
Revised: April 17, 2012
Accepted: April 20, 2012
Published online: October 21, 2012
Abstract

Rectal cancers extending through the rectal wall, or involving locoregional lymph nodes (T3/4 or N1/2), have been more difficult to cure. The confines of the bony pelvis and the necessity of preserving the autonomic nerves makes surgical extirpation challenging, which accounts for the high rates of local and distant relapse in this setting. Combined multimodality treatment for rectal cancer stage II and III was recommended from National Institute of Health consensus. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation using fluoropyrimidine-based regimen prior to surgical resection has emerged as the standard of care in the United States. Optimal time of surgery after neoadjuvant treatment remained unclear and prospective randomized controlled trial is ongoing. Traditionally, 6-8 wk waiting period was commonly used. The accuracy of studies attempting to determine tumor complete response remains problematic. Currently, surgery remains the standard of care for rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation, whereas observational management is still investigational. In this article, we outline trends and controversies associated with optimal pre-treatment staging, neoadjuvant therapies, surgery, and adjuvant therapy.

Keywords: Rectal cancer, Neoadjuvant chemoradiation, Response, Treatment, Staging, Recurrence