Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2011; 17(4): 514-521
Published online Jan 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i4.514
Proximal and distal esophageal sensitivity is decreased in patients with Barrett’s esophagus
Anne L Krarup, Søren S Olesen, Peter Funch-Jensen, Hans Gregersen, Asbjørn M Drewes
Anne L Krarup, Søren S Olesen, Hans Gregersen, Asbjørn M Drewes, Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
Peter Funch-Jensen, Department of Surgery L, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Author contributions: Krarup AL, Funch-Jensen P, Gregersen H and Drewes AM designed the research; Krarup AL and Olesen SS performed the research; Krarup AL, Olesen SS, Gregersen H and Drewes AM analyzed the data; Krarup AL, Olesen SS, Funch-Jensen P, Gregersen H and Drewes AM wrote the paper.
Supported by “Hertha Christensens Fond” and “The Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation”
Correspondence to: Asbjørn M Drewes, MD, PhD, DMSc, Professor, Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. drewes@smi.auc.dk
Telephone: +45-99326264 Fax: +45-99326507
Received: June 5, 2010
Revised: September 18, 2010
Accepted: September 25, 2010
Published online: January 28, 2011
Abstract

AIM: To investigate sensations to multimodal pain stimulation in the metaplastic and normal parts of the esophagus in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE).

METHODS: Fifteen patients with BE and 15 age-matched healthy volunteers were subjected to mechanical, thermal and electrical pain stimuli of the esophagus. Both the metaplastic part and the normal part (4 and 14 cm, respectively, above the esophago-gastric junction) were examined. At sensory thresholds the stimulation intensity, referred pain areas, and evoked brain potentials were recorded.

RESULTS: Patients were hyposensitive to heat stimulation both in the metaplastic part [median stimulation time to reach the pain detection threshold: 15 (12-34) s vs 14 (6-23) s in controls; F = 4.5, P = 0.04] and the normal part of the esophagus [median 17 (6-32) s vs 13 (8-20) s in controls; F = 6.2, P = 0.02]. Furthermore, patients were hyposensitive in the metaplastic part of the esophagus to mechanical distension [median volume at moderate pain: 50 (20-50) mL vs 33 (13-50) mL in controls; F = 5.7, P = 0.02]. No indication of central nervous system abnormalities was present, as responses were comparable between groups to electrical pain stimuli in the metaplastic part [median current evoking moderate pain: 13 (6-26) mA vs 12 (9-24) mA in controls; F = 0.1, P = 0.7], and in the normal part of the esophagus [median current evoking moderate pain: 9 (6-16) mA, vs 11 (5-11) mA in controls; F = 3.4, P = 0.07]. Furthermore, no differences were seen for the referred pain areas (P-values all > 0.3) or latencies and amplitudes for the evoked brain potentials (P-values all > 0.1).

CONCLUSION: Patients with BE are hyposensitive both in the metaplastic and normal part of esophagus likely as a result of abnormalities affecting peripheral nerve pathways.

Keywords: Barrett’s esophagus, Heat, Multimodal, Pain, Sensitivity