Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2008; 14(36): 5601-5605
Published online Sep 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5601
Prolapse gastropathy syndrome may be a predictor of pathologic acid reflux
Jin-Soo Kim, Hyung-Keun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Hiun-Suk Chae, Byung-Wook Kim, Jin-Il Kim, Sok-Won Han, Kyu-Yong Choi
Jin-Soo Kim, Hyung-Keun Kim, Young-Seok Cho, Hiun-Suk Chae, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 480-717, South Korea
Byung-Wook Kim, Kyu-Yong Choi, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Our Lady of Mercy Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 403-720, South Korea
Jin-Il Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Yeoeuido St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul 150-713, South Korea
Sok-Won Han, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Holy Family Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 420-717, South Korea
Author contributions: Chae HS, Kim BW, Kim JI, Han SW, Choi KY designed study and revised manuscript; Kim HK, Cho YS analyzed data; Kim JS mainly performed study and wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Hiun-Suk Chae, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, 65-1 Geumo-dong, Uijeongbu city, Kyunggido 480-717, South Korea. chs@catholic.ac.kr
Telephone: +82-31-8203019 Fax: +82-31-8472719
Received: April 2, 2008
Revised: August 24, 2008
Accepted: September 1, 2008
Published online: September 28, 2008
Abstract

AIM: To assess the occurrence of gastric acid reflux into the esophagus in endoscopically confirmed prolapse gastropathy syndrome (PGS).

METHODS: Using ambulatory esophageal pH measurement (BRAVOTM wireless esophageal pH monitoring system), twenty-six patients with PGS were compared with twenty-one patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) as controls. We assessed several reflux parameters, including the percentage of total time at pH < 4, and the DeMeester score.

RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between the PGS group and the EE group as to mean age, sex ratio and pH recording time. The EE group showed more severe reflux than the PGS group, as evaluated in terms of the longest duration of reflux, the number of reflux episodes, the number of reflux episodes lasting > 5 min, the total time with pH < 4 during acid reflux episodes, and the DeMeester score, but none of these parameters showed statistically significant difference. Although 53.8% (14/26) of the PGS group and 76.2% (16/21) of the EE group demonstrated pathologic acid reflux (DeMeester score > 14.72), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of pathologic acid reflux (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in pathologic acid reflux between the PGS and EE group. These data suggest that endoscopically diagnosed PGS might be a predictor of pathologic acid reflux.

Keywords: Prolapse gastropathy syndrome, Pathologic acid reflux, Erosive esophagitis, Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, Retching