Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2008; 14(14): 2222-2225
Published online Apr 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2222
Cost saving by reloading the multiband ligator in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation: A proposal for developing countries
Zaigham Abbas, Lubna Rizvi, Umair Syed Ahmed, Khalid Mumtaz, Wasim Jafri
Zaigham Abbas, Lubna Rizvi, Umair Syed Ahmed, Khalid Mumtaz, Wasim Jafri, Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
Author contributions: Abbas Z introduced the method of reloading, conceived the study, performed the procedure, and wrote the manuscript; Rizvi L had administrative and supportive contribution and collected data; Ahmed US collected and analyzed the data; Mumtaz K and Jafri W performed the procedure and reviewed the manuscript critically.
Correspondence to: Dr. Zaigham Abbas, Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan. zaigham@akunet.o
Telephone: +92-21-4930051
Fax: +92-21-4934294
Received: December 10, 2007
Revised: February 13, 2008
Published online: April 14, 2008
Abstract

AIM: To assess the cost savings of reloading the multiband ligator in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) used on the same patient for subsequent sessions.

METHODS: This single centre retrospective descriptive study analysed patients undergoing variceal ligation at a tertiary care centre between 1st January, 2003 and 30th June, 2006. The multiband ligator was reloaded with six hemorrhoidal bands using hemorrhoidal ligator for the second and subsequent sessions. Analysis of cost saving was done for the number of follow-up sessions for the variceal eradication.

RESULTS: A total of 261 patients underwent at least one session of endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation between January 2003 and June 2006. Out of 261, 108 patients (males 67) agreed to follow the eradication program and underwent repeated sessions. A total of 304 sessions was performed with 2.81 sessions per patient on average. Thirty-two patients could not complete the programme. In 76 patients (70%), variceal obliteration was achieved. The ratio of the costs for the session with reloaded ligator versus a session with a new ligator was 1:2.37. Among the patients who completed esophageal varices eradication, cost saving with reloaded ligator was 58%.

CONCLUSION: EVL using reloaded multiband ligators for the follow-up sessions on patients undergoing variceal eradication is a cost saving procedure. Reloading the ligator thus is recommended especially for developing countries where most of the patients are not health insured.

Keywords: Esophageal varices, Reloading, Multiband ligator, Eradication, Cost saving