Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2007; 13(4): 612-618
Published online Jan 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i4.612
Distribution of trace metal concentrations in paired cancerous and non-cancerous human stomach tissues
Mehmet Yaman, Gokce Kaya, Hayrettin Yekeler
Mehmet Yaman, Gokce Kaya, Firat University, Sciences and Arts Faculty, Chemistry Department, Elazig, Turkey
Hayrettin Yekeler, Chief of Staff in State Hospital, Elazig, Turkey
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Professor Mehmet Yaman, Firat University, Sciences and Arts Faculty, Chemistry Department, Elazig 23119, Turkey. myaman@firat.edu.tr
Telephone: +90-424-2370000 Fax: +90-424-2330062
Received: August 23, 2006
Revised: September 23, 2006
Accepted: October 23, 2006
Published online: January 28, 2007
Abstract

AIM: To assess whether trace metal concentrations (which influence metabolism as both essential and non-essential elements) are increased or decreased in cancerous tissues and to understand the precise role of these metals in carcinogenesis.

METHODS: Concentrations of trace metals including Cd, Ni, Cu, Zn, Fe, Mg and Ca in both cancerous and non-cancerous stomach tissue samples were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). Tissue samples were digested using microwave energy. Slotted tube atom trap was used to improve the sensitivity of copper and cadmium in flame AAS determinations.

RESULTS: From the obtained data in this study, the concentrations of nickel, copper and iron in the cancerous human stomach were found to be significantly higher than those in the non-cancerous tissues, by using t-test for the paired samples. Furthermore, the average calcium concentrations in the cancerous stomach tissue samples were found to be significantly lower than those in the non-cancerous stomach tissue samples by using t-test. Exceedingly high Zn concentrations (207-826 mg/kg) were found in two paired stomach tissue samples from both cancerous and non-cancerous parts.

CONCLUSION: In contrast to the literature data for Cu and Fe, the concentrations of copper, iron and nickel in cancerous tissue samples are higher than those in the non-cancerous samples. Furthermore, the Ca levels are lower in cancerous tissue samples than in non-cancerous tissue samples.

Keywords: Cancer, Trace metals, Human stomach, Microwave energy, Atomic absorption