Clinical Research
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2006; 12(45): 7299-7303
Published online Dec 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i45.7299
Endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice who are to undergo gemcitabine chemotherapy
Osamu Takasawa, Naotaka Fujita, Go Kobayashi, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito, Jun Horaguchi
Osamu Takasawa, Naotaka Fujita, Go Kobayashi, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito, Jun Horaguchi, Sendai City Medical Center, Gastroenterology, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyaginoku, Sendai, Miyagi 983-0824, Japan
Correspondence to: Osamu Takasawa, Sendai City Medical Center, Gastroenterology, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyaginoku, Sendai, Miyagi 983-0824, Japan. mou@a5w.highway.ne.jp
Telephone: +81-22-2521111 Fax: +81-22-2529431
Received: August 4, 2006
Revised: August 28, 2006
Accepted: November 7, 2006
Published online: December 7, 2006
Abstract

AIM: To assess optimum endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) in cases with unresectable pancreatic cancer in the era of gemcitabine (GEM).

METHODS: Thirty patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, who presented with jaundice and underwent chemotherapy using GEM after EBD were included in this study (GEM group). Fifteen cases with the same clinical manifestation and stage of pancreatic cancer treated with EBD alone were also included as controls. A covered metallic stent (CMS) or a plastic stent (PS) was used for EBD. The mean survival time (MST) in each group, risk factors of survival time, type of stent used and associated survival time, occlusion rate of stent, patency period of stent, and risk factors of stent occlusion were evaluated.

RESULTS: MST in the GEM group was longer than that in the control (9.9 mo vs 6.2 mo). In the GEM group, the survival time was not different between those who underwent metallic stenting and those who underwent plastic stenting. Stent occlusion occurred in 60% of the PS group and 7% of the CMS group. The median stent patency in the PS-GEM group and the CMS-GEM group was 5 mo and 7.5 mo, respectively. Use of a PS was the only risk factor of stent occlusion.

CONCLUSION: A CMS is recommended in cases presenting with jaundice due to unresectable pancreatic cancer, since the use of a CMS makes it possible to continue chemotherapy using GEM without repetition of stent replacement.

Keywords: Gemcitabine chemotherapy; Endoscopic biliary drainage; Covered metallic stent; Pancreatic cancer; Unresectable pancreatic cancer; Obstructive jaundice