Basic Research
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2005; 11(35): 5506-5511
Published online Sep 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i35.5506
MR diffusion-weighed imaging of rabbit liver
You-Hong Yuan, En-Hua Xiao, Zhong He, Jun Xiang, Ke-Li Tang, Rong-Hua Yan, Ke Jin, Zi-Wen Peng
You-Hong Yuan, En-Hua Xiao, Zhong He, Jun Xiang, Ke-Li Tang, Rong-Hua Yan, Ke Jin, Zi-Wen Peng, Department of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30070235, 30470508; Science Foundation of Hunan Province, No. 202064, 04-SK-306-2
Correspondence to: Dr. En-Hua Xiao, Department of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan Province, China. xiaogdk@sohu.com
Telephone: +86-731-5550355 Fax: +86-731-4510190
Received: July 26, 2004
Revised: December 26, 2004
Accepted: December 29, 2004
Published online: September 21, 2005
Abstract

AIM: To study the techniques of MR diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI) for normal rabbit liver.

METHODS: After 15 normal New Zealand white rabbits and one New Zealand white rabbit implanted with VX-2 tumor were anesthetized with 3% soluble pentobarbitone, DWI was performed respectively for different b values, repetition times (TR) or thicknesses, when other parameters were the same and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed respectively, or with different field of views (FOV) or coil when other parameters were the same. The distinction between groups was analyzed by SPSS10.0 with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), quality index (QI) or signal-noise ratio (SNR).

RESULTS: As b value increased, liver ADC, QI and SNR of DWI became smaller and simultaneously (F = 292.87, 156.1, 88.23, P<0.01). QI of DWI was high, when b value was 10, 50 or 100 respectively, but the distinction between them was insignificant; when b value was 800, QI and SNR of DWI were low. QI and SNR of DWI had no significant difference between TR = 4 000, 6 000 and 8 000. QI of DWI with 2 mm thickness was bigger than that with 5 mm thickness (t = 3.04, P<0.01), but SNR of DWI with 2 mm thickness was significantly smaller (t = -17.86, P<0.01). SNR of MRI with knee joint coil was obviously bigger than that with cranium coil [t = -5.77 (T1WI) or -4.02 (T2WI), P<0.01], but QI of MRI was smaller on the contrary [t = 7.10 (T1WI) or 3.97 (T2WI), P<0.01]. When FOV was enlarged gradually, SNR of MRI increased [F = 85.81 (T1WI) or 221.96 (T2WI), P<0.01], but QI firstly increased, then decreased [F = 68.67 (T1WI) or 69.46 (T2WI), P<0.01] and QI of MRI was the biggest when FOV was 20 cm×15 cm.

CONCLUSION: The scanning technique is very important in DWI of rabbit liver and the overall quality of DWI with b (100 s/mm2), thickness (2 mm), cranium coils and FOV (20 cm×15 cm) was best in our study, when other parameters were the same.

Keywords: Liver, Rabbits, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion-weighted imaging, Technology