Brief Reports
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2005; 11(24): 3742-3745
Published online Jun 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i24.3742
Value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction after unsuccessful conservative treatment: A prospective evaluation
Hok-Kwok Choi, Wai-Lun Law, Judy Wai-Chu Ho, Kin-Wah Chu
Hok-Kwok Choi, Wai-Lun Law, Judy Wai-Chu Ho, Kin-Wah Chu, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Wai-Lun Law, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China. lawwl@hkucc.hku.hk
Telephone: +852-2855-4800 Fax: +852-2872-8425
Received: September 2, 2004
Revised: September 3, 2004
Accepted: January 5, 2005
Published online: June 28, 2005
Abstract

AIM: Gastrografin is a hyperosmolar water-soluble contrast medium. Besides its predictive value for the need for operative treatment, a potential therapeutic role of this agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction has been suggested. This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction when conservative treatment failed.

METHODS: Patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction were given trial conservative treatment unless there was fear of bowel strangulation. Those responded in the initial 48 h had conservative treatment continued. Patients who showed no improvement in the initial 48 h were given 100 mL of gastrografin through nasogastric tube followed by serial abdominal radiographs. Patients with the contrast appeared in large bowel within 24 h were regarded as having partial obstruction and conservative treatment was continued. Patients in which the contrast failed to reach large bowel within 24 h were considered to have complete obstruction and laparotomy was performed.

RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients with 245 episodes of adhesive obstruction were included. Fifteen patients were operated on soon after admission due to fear of strangulation. One hundred and eighty-six episodes of obstruction showed improvement in the initial 48 h and conservative treatment was continued. Two patients had subsequent operations because of persistent obstruction. Forty-four episodes of obstruction showed no improvement within 48 h and gastrografin was administered. Seven patients underwent complete obstruction surgery. Partial obstruction was demonstrated in 37 other cases, obstruction resolved subsequently in all of them except one patient who required laparotomy because of persistent obstruction. The overall operative rate in this study was 10%. There was no complication that could be attributed to the use of gastrografin.

CONCLUSION: The use of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction after unsuccessful conservative treatment is safe and reduces the need for surgical intervention.

Keywords: Gastrografin, Adhesions, Intestinal obstruction