Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 15, 2004; 10(2): 287-291
Published online Jan 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.287
Long-term outcome of esophageal myotomy for achalasia
Jun-Feng Liu, Jun Zhang, Zi-Qiang Tian, Qi-Zhang Wang, Bao-Qing Li, Fu-Shun Wang, Fu-Min Cao, Yue-Feng Zhang, Yong Li, Zhao Fan, Jian-Jing Han, Hui Liu
Jun-Feng Liu, Zi-Qiang Tian, Qi-Zhang Wang, Bao-Qing Li, Fu-Shun Wang, Fu-Min Cao, Yue-Feng Zhang, Yong Li, Zhao Fan, Jian-Jing Han, Hui Liu, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
Jun Zhang, Department of Surgery, Shenzhou City Hospital, Shenzhou 052860, Hebei Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Jun-Feng Liu, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital, Hebei Medical University, 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China. liujf@heinfo.net
Telephone: +86-311-6033941 Fax: +86-311-6077634
Received: June 21, 2003
Revised: July 17, 2003
Accepted: July 24, 2003
Published online: January 15, 2004
Abstract

AIM: Modified Heller’s myotomy is still the first choice for achalasia and the assessment of surgical outcomes is usually made based on the subjective sensation of patients. This study was to objectively assess the long-term outcomes of esophageal myotomy for achalasia using esophageal manometry, 24-hourour pH monitoring, esophageal scintigraphy and fiberoptic esophagoscopy.

METHODS: From February 1979 to October 2000, 176 patients with achalasia underwent modified Heller’s myotomy, including esophageal myotomy alone in 146 patients, myotomy in combination with Gallone or Dor antireflux procedure in 22 and 8 patients, respectively. Clinical score, pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), esophageal clearance rate and gastroesophageal reflux were determined before and 1 to 22 years after surgery.

RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 14 years, 84.5% of patients had a good or excellent relief of symptoms, and clinical scores as well as resting pressures of the esophageal body and LES were reduced compared with preoperative values (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in DeMeester score between pre- and postoperative patients (P = 0.51). Esophageal transit was improved in postoperative patients, but still slower than that in normal controls. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients who underwent esophageal myotomy alone was 63.6% compared to 27.3% in those who underwent myotomy and antireflux procedure (P = 0.087). Three (1.7%) patients were complicated with esophageal cancer after surgery.

CONCLUSION: Esophageal myotomy for achalasia can reduce the resting pressures of the esophageal body and LES and improve esophageal transit and dysphagia. Myotomy in combination with antireflux procedure can prevent gastroesophageal reflux to a certain extent, but further randomized studies should be carried out to demonstrate its efficacy.

Keywords: $[Keywords]