Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain at increased risk for colorectal cancer and death from colorectal cancer compared with the general population despite improvements in inflammation control with advanced therapies, colonoscopic surveillance and reductions in environmental risk factors. This guideline update from 2010 for colorectal surveillance of patients over 16 years with colonic inflammatory bowel disease was developed by stakeholders representing UK physicians, endoscopists, surgeons, specialist nurses and patients with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodological support.An a priori protocol was published describing the approach to three levels of statement: GRADE recommendations, good practice statements or expert opinion statements. A systematic review of 7599 publications, with appraisal and GRADE analysis of trials and network meta-analysis, where appropriate, was performed. Risk thresholding guided GRADE judgements.We made 73 statements for the delivery of an IBD colorectal surveillance service, including outcome standards for service and endoscopist audit, and the importance of shared decision-making with patients.Core areas include: risk of colorectal cancer, IBD-related post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer; service organisation and supporting patient concordance; starting and stopping surveillance, who should or should not receive surveillance; risk stratification, including web-based multivariate risk calculation of surveillance intervals; colonoscopic modalities, bowel preparation, biomarkers and artificial intelligence aided detection; chemoprevention; the role of non-conventional dysplasia, serrated lesions and non-targeted biopsies; management of dysplasia, both endoscopic and surgical, and the structure and role of the multidisciplinary team in IBD dysplasia management; training in IBD colonoscopic surveillance, sustainability (green endoscopy), cost-effectiveness and patient experience. Sixteen research priorities are suggested.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer as compared with the general population. Endoscopic surveillance to detect early dysplastic changes is advised by several published clinical guidelines, which provide recommendations as to the timing and performance of surveillance procedures. There is a paucity of data as to adherence with these guidelines in clinical practice.

A longitudinal inception cohort study of all new patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease across a service network of Australian hospitals between January 2005 and June 2014, with continuous follow-up in a gastroenterology clinic until December 31, 2022. Patients were included if they warranted surveillance according to the Australian guidelines. Adherence to guidelines and technical and quality measures were reported.

A total of 136 patients were included, and a total of 263 surveillance procedures were performed. Ninety-five patients (70%) had their first surveillance colonoscopy within the correct time interval. Fifty patients (37%) were completely adherent to guidelines with respect to timing of all surveillance procedure. The overall dysplasia detection rate for surveillance procedures was 10%. Chromoendoscopy was only performed in 16% of procedures.

Adherence to endoscopic surveillance guidelines with regard to timing of procedures and the utilization of chromoendoscopy is poor. Further clinician education, promotion of the surveillance guidelines and incorporation of chromoendoscopy training as part of the national colonoscopy training program may improve adherence to guidelines.

Dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often suboptimal and deviates from guidelines.

To assess dysplasia surveillance behaviours and adherence to guidelines amongst a large tertiary teaching health network with a specialised IBD unit to identify areas where dysplasia surveillance could be improved.

A retrospective audit of IBD surveillance colonoscopy practice over an 18-month period was performed using the Provation Endoscopy Database and the hospital's primary sclerosing cholangitis database.

The audit identified 115 dysplasia surveillance colonoscopies. A total of 37% of index dysplasia colonoscopies were outside recommended guidelines. A total of 10% had inadequate bowel preparation and only 40% had excellent bowel preparation. A total of 28% of patients underwent dye-based chromoendoscopy and 69% underwent high-definition white-light endoscopy. Dye chromoendoscopy was more likely to be used by IBD specialists than interventional endoscopists (P = 0.008) and other endoscopists (P = 0.004). Only IBD specialists and interventional endoscopists used dye chromoendoscopy. Dysplasia or colorectal cancer was detected in 3.4% of the colonoscopies. Overall, the several dysplasia examinations were lower than expected.

Dysplasia surveillance in the IBD population remains an area of improvement given the current national guidelines. IBD specialists are more likely to perform dye chromoendoscopy than other endoscopists/gastroenterologists. Dysplasia rates in this real-world contemporary setting are less than expected in historical studies and may represent improvements in IBD management principles and medications.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Limited literature exists on patients' knowledge of CRC risk and management. Attitude toward doctor-recommended management and the role of healthcare providers (HCPs) in CRC risk awareness remain unexplored. This study aimed to fill the gap in knowledge about CRC risk awareness and management in IBD patients in the UK.

This cross-sectional internet-based study was conducted in April-July 2019. Adult (>18 years) IBD patients with a confirmed diagnosis for 2 years and adequate command of English language were invited from non-Natinal Health Services sources. A self-designed and piloted questionnaire with open- and closed-ended questions was used. Closed-ended data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and open-ended responses were analyzed using content analysis.

Ninety-two participants (52.5% Crohn's disease and 67.5% females) responded. Around 88% knew that IBD increased CRC risk. Only 20.7% were aware of colonoscopy as the best screening tool; 88% were unaware of screening initiation time. Almost 90% would agree to a doctor's recommendation of colonoscopy. For dysplasia with 10% risk of CRC, 46.7% would not agree with colectomy. Some 48% reported to have never had a discussion about the risk of CRC in IBD with their HCPs, while 58% were not informed of the role of screening and surveillance in managing CRC risk.

IBD patients were poorly aware of CRC risk management and had mixed willingness to comply with a doctor's recommendation. HCP's role in cancer knowledge dissemination was suboptimal and patients desired more information.

Australasia, encompassing Australia, New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea, has some of the highest prevalence's of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the world. The way IBD medicine is practiced varies between and within these countries. There are numerous shared issues of IBD care between Australia and New Zealand, whereas Papua New Guinea has its' own unique set of circumstances. This review looks to explore some of the barriers to IBD care across the continent from the perspective of local IBD healthcare professionals. Barriers to IBD care that are explored include access to IBD multidisciplinary teams, provision of nutritional-based therapies, the prevalence and engagement of IBD-associated mental health disorders, access to medicine, access to endoscopy, rural barriers to care, Indigenous IBD care and paediatric issues. We look to highlight areas where improvements to IBD care across Australasia could be made as well as address research needs.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Individuals with IBD are at increased risk for several malignancies originating in the intestine, such as colorectal cancer, small bowel adenocarcinoma, intestinal lymphoma, and anal cancer. There are also several extraintestinal malignancies associated with IBD and IBD therapies, including cholangiocarcinoma, skin cancer, hematologic malignancies, genitourinary cancer, cervical cancer, and prostate cancer. The authors summarize the risk of cancer in patients with IBD, diagnosis and management of colorectal neoplasia in IBD, and management of patients with IBD and active or recent cancer.

Patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Current guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance, yet epidemiological studies show poor compliance. The aims of our study were to analyse adherence to endoscopic surveillance, its impact on advanced colorectal lesions, and risk factors of non-adherence.

A retrospective multicentre study of IBD patients with criteria for CRC surveillance, diagnosed between 2005 and 2008 and followed up to 2020, was performed. Following European guidelines, patients were stratified into risk groups and adherence was considered when surveillance was performed according to the recommendations (±1 year). Cox-proportional regression analyses were used to compare the risk of lesions. p-values below 0.05 were considered significant.

A total of 1031 patients (732 ulcerative colitis, 259 Crohn's disease and 40 indeterminate colitis; mean age of 36 ± 15 years) were recruited from 25 Spanish centres. Endoscopic screening was performed in 86% of cases. Adherence to guidelines was 27% (95% confidence interval, CI = 24-29). Advanced lesions and CRC were detected in 38 (4%) and 7 (0.7%) patients respectively. Adherence was associated with increased detection of advanced lesions (HR = 3.59; 95% CI = 1.3-10.1; p = 0.016). Risk of delay or non-performance of endoscopic follow-up was higher as risk groups increased (OR = 3.524; 95% CI = 2.462-5.044; p < 0.001 and OR = 4.291; 95%CI = 2.409-7.644; p < 0.001 for intermediate- and high- vs low-risk groups).

Adherence to endoscopic surveillance allows earlier detection of advanced lesions but is low. Groups at higher risk of CRC are associated with lower adherence.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) due to mucosal inflammation. As current surveillance guidelines form a burden on patients and healthcare costs, stratification of high-risk patients is crucial. Cigarette smoke reduces inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC) but not Crohn's disease (CD) and forms a known risk factor for CRN in the general population. Due to this divergent association, the effect of smoking on CRN in IBD is unclear and subject of this study.

In this retrospective cohort study, 1,386 IBD patients with previous biopsies analyzed and reported in the PALGA register were screened for development of CRN. Clinical factors and cigarette smoke were evaluated. Patients were stratified for guideline-based risk of CRN. Cox-regression modeling was used to estimate the effect of cigarette smoke and its additive effect within the current risk stratification for prediction of CRN.

153 (11.5%) patients developed CRN. Previously described risk factors, i.e. first-degree family member with CRN in CD (p-value=.001), presence of post-inflammatory polyps in UC (p-value=.005), were replicated. Former smoking increased risk of CRN in UC (HR 1.73; 1.05-2.85), whereas passive smoke exposure yielded no effect. For CD, active smoking (2.20; 1.02-4.76) and passive smoke exposure (1.87; 1.09-3.20) significantly increased CRN risk. Addition of smoke exposure to the current risk-stratification model significantly improved model fit for CD.

This study is the first to describe the important role of cigarette smoke in CRN development in IBD patients. Adding this risk factor improves the current risk stratification for CRN surveillance strategies.

A successful colitis cancer surveillance programme requires effective action to be taken when dysplasia is detected. This is the first international cross-sectional study to evaluate clinician understanding of dysplasia-cancer risk and management practice since the most recent international guidelines were introduced in 2015.

A 15-item international online survey was disseminated to gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons.

A total of 294 clinicians [93.5% gastroenterologists] from 60 countries responded; 23% did not have access to high-definition chromoendoscopy. University hospitals were more likely than non-academic workplaces to provide second expert histopathologist review [67% vs 46%; p = 0.002] and formal multidisciplinary team meeting discussion [73% vs 52%; p = 0.001] of dysplasia cases. Perceptions of 5-year cancer risk associated with endoscopically unresectable low-grade dysplasia varied between 0% and 100%. Non-academic hospital affiliation was predictive of lower perceived cancer risks. Although most [98.4%] respondents advised a colectomy for endoscopically unresectable visible high-grade dysplasia, only 34.4% advised a colectomy for unresectable visible low-grade dysplasia. Respondents from university hospitals were more likely to consider colectomy for multifocal low-grade dysplasia (odds ratio [OR] 2.17). If invisible unifocal low-grade dysplasia was detected, continued surveillance over colectomy was the preferred management among clinicians working mainly in private clinics [OR 9.4] and least preferred in those who had performed more than 50 surveillance colonoscopies [OR 0.41].

Clinicians with less surveillance colonoscopy experience and from non-academic centres appear to have lower cancer risk perceptions and are less likely to advocate colectomy for higher-risk low-grade dysplasia. Further education may align current management practice with clinical guidelines.

Longstanding and extensive ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated with the subsequent development of colorectal cancer (CRC). This article summarizes key strategies for colonoscopic surveillance, the most widely used and evidence-based method of CRC prevention. As currently constituted and practiced, surveillance examinations every 1 to 3 years with lesion detection and removal using high-definition endoscopic systems with or without pancolonic spray-dye chromoendoscopy is the best method for mitigating the development of CRC morbidity and mortality. For patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with UC, surveillance should begin at the time of diagnosis and colonoscopy should be performed annually.

The risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is higher compared to the general population and it is related to the type, severity, duration, and extension of the disease.

This review aims to highlight current evidence from the literature supporting the role of endoscopic surveillance of CRC in patients with IBD.

Even in the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evidence from the literature supports the effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance in reducing IBD-related CRC incidence and mortality. As a consequence, current guidelines recommend colonoscopy 8-10 years after disease or symptom onset in all patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) involving at least one-third of the colon and agree on the necessity of annual surveillance in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, an overall agreement on the optimal intervals for surveillance of low-intermediate risk patients is absent and 2-5 year intervals have been proposed. In the near future, further studies are needed to assess the most effective intervals and tailor the surveillance based on the personal risk profile. Additionally, further efforts should be made to evaluate the role of noninvasive tests as primary screening, thus avoiding unnecessary colonoscopies.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing intestinal neoplasia-particularly colorectal neoplasia, including dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC)-as a primary consequence of chronic inflammation. While the current incidence of CRC in IBD is lower compared with prior decades, due, in large part, to more effective therapies and improved colonoscopic technologies, CRC still accounts for a significant proportion of IBD-related deaths. The focus of this review is on the pathogenesis; epidemiology, including disease- and patient-related risk factors; diagnosis; surveillance; and management of IBD-associated neoplasia.

Patients affected by ulcerative colitis (UC) are more likely to develop colorectal cancer, and are often diagnosed with lymph node involvement (N+) at surgery.

To identify the risk factors for N+ cancer in UC patients.

Patients undergoing surgery from 2001 to 2018 in six European tertiary centres were included. N+ patients were compared to the control group (N-) for clinical variables. The evaluation of risk factors for N+ was assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

A total of 130 patients were included. Median duration of disease was 21 years (1-52). Forty patients (30.8%) were N+ at surgery. Eighteen (13.8%) developed cancer within 10 years from the onset of UC. Younger age at surgery (Odds ratio -OR- 0.96, p = 0.042), left colon location (OR 2.44, p = 0.045) and the presence of stricture (OR 5.07, p = 0.002) were associated with N+.

Location in the left colon, presence of strictures and younger age strongly correlated with a higher risk of N+ cancer, which could develop before the starting point of surveillance. Duration, extension and severity of disease were not associated with N+. These results should be considered in the evaluation of risk of advanced cancer in UC patients.

This article begins with a brief overview of risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease to concretize the approach to risk stratification. It then provides an up-to-date review of diagnosis and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease, which integrates new and emerging data in the field. This is particularly relevant in an era of increased attention to cost- and resource-containment from the health systems vantage point, coupled with a heightened prioritization of patient quality of life and shared decision-making. Also provided is a brief discussion of the status of newer therapeutic techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection.

There is a growing evidence for over-, under-, or misuse of health care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Most studies looked at treatment variability or used quality measures, which mostly capture supportive interventions rather than treatment of IBD in itself. We aimed to evaluate if current recommendations in clinical practice guidelines regarding the medical treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases are being followed in Germany.

A questionnaire was sent to 1901 patients insured with two large German statutory sickness funds and an ICD 10 diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). The questionnaire asked about drug treatment, indications for drug treatment, provision of surveillance endoscopies in ulcerative colitis patients, and smoking status in Crohn's disease patients.

Out of 460 evaluable patients, 62.4% of UC patients and 53.9% of CD patients were treated with mesalamine according to guidelines, 91.3% of all patients were treated with glucocorticoids according to guideline recommendations, while only 75.6% received recommended immunosuppressive treatment. Of UC patients, 94.5% had surveillance colonoscopies at the recommended interval and 58.8% of CD patients were non-smokers. No predictor for overall treatment according to guidelines could be found while being of age older than 60 or being treated outside of a dedicated IBD clinic was associated with less immunosuppressive treatment.

A large proportion of patients with IBD do not receive drug treatment in accordance with clinical practice guidelines. Quality improvement measures are much needed.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for approximately 2% of the annual mortality from CRC overall, but 10-15% of the annual deaths in IBD patients. IBD-related CRC patients are also affected at a younger age than sporadic CRC patients, and have a 5-year survival rate of 50%. Despite optimal medical treatment, the chronic inflammatory state inherent in IBD increases the risk for high-grade dysplasia and CRC, with additional input from genetic and environmental risk factors and the microbiome. Recognizing risk factors, implementing appropriate surveillance, and identifying high-risk patients are key to managing the CRC risk in IBD patients. Chemoprevention strategies exist, and studies evaluating their efficacy are underway. Once dysplasia or invasive cancer is diagnosed, appropriate surgical resection and postoperative treatment and surveillance are necessary. Here, we discuss the current state of IBD-related CRC, prevalence, risk factors, and evidence for surveillance, prophylaxis, and treatment recommendations.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] colitis are at increased risk for colorectal cancer [CRC]. We examined the proportion and most likely aetiology of potentially preventable postcolonoscopy CRCs [PCCRCs] in a population-based cohort. Furthermore, adherence to IBD surveillance guidelines was evaluated in both PCCRCs and the remainder of prevalent CRCs.

All IBD patients diagnosed from 1991 to 2011 in the South Limburg region of The Netherlands [i.e. IBDSL cohort] were included. CRC cases were cross-checked with the Dutch pathology database and cancer registry. PCCRCs were defined as cancers diagnosed within 6-60 months after a colonoscopy and were classified as attributable to 'inappropriate surveillance interval', 'inadequate bowel examination', 'incomplete resection', 'missed lesion' or 'newly developed cancer'.

Twenty CRC cases were identified during 25,931 patient years of follow-up in 2,801 patients. The proportion of PCCRCs was 45.0%. Of these, 55.6% could be considered a 'missed lesion', while other possible aetiologies occurred only once. Considering both PCCRCs [n=9] and prevalent CRCs [n=11], ten were detected after publication of the surveillance guideline, but only three patients were enrolled. Moreover, 6 CRCs [30.0%] were detected before the recommended start of surveillance.

In the IBDSL cohort, 45.0% of all CRCs were considered to be PCCRCs, mainly classified as missed lesions. Additionally, a large proportion of CRCs in our cohort were observed before a surveillance endoscopy was performed. Therefore, stringent adherence to IBD surveillance guidelines, improving endoscopy techniques and adjusting the surveillance program may lead to a decrease in CRC incidence.

Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended in patients with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as they are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Non-invasive surveillance may improve compliance and access. Multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) has been validated for screening of sporadic CRC but has not been assessed in IBD. Our aim was to assess the performance of a MT-sDNA test in a real-life surveillance setting of patients with longstanding IBD.

A total of 192 IBD patients enrolled from two prospective cohorts submitted an EDTA buffered stool sample and underwent chromo- or white light colonoscopy. Stools were assayed for methylated BMP3 & NDRG4, mutant KRAS and β-actin by a laboratory blinded to clinical data.

The multitarget-sDNA panel was positive in 2/2 CRC and 5/15 low-grade dysplasia (LGD) < 1 cm in diameter. Sensitivities were 100% (95% CI 16-100%) for CRC and 33% (95% CI 13-61%) for LGD lesions <1 cm, with specificities of 87% (95% CI 81-91%) and 93% (95% CI 88-96%), respectively. The estimated number of patients needed to screen to detect a single CRC was 96 (95% CI 93-99%) and was 28 (95% CI 22-34%) to detect any colorectal neoplasia (CRN).

The MT-sDNA panel detected CRC in IBD. Sensitivity for sub-centimeter colorectal neoplasms in IBD patients appears similar to that observed in the general population. The test may be a valuable tool for detection of malignancy during structured surveillance of long-term IBD in a first line hospital setting.

The risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) is increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate if patients who developed CRC in the setting of UC were undergoing guideline-recommended surveillance colonoscopies and to determine the impact of surveillance on the staging of CRC.

Data was obtained from the Veterans Affairs healthcare system to identify patients with UC and CRC. Stage 0 and I were considered early-stage CRC, whereas stage ≥ II were considered advanced-stage CRC. Patients were considered to have adequate surveillance if they had a colonoscopy within 2 years before developing CRC. We conducted a case-case analysis using multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio for presenting with advanced-stage CRC associated with lack of adequate surveillance.

Of the 48 patients, the majority were white (70.8%) and male (100%). Sixty-nine percent of patients had inadequate surveillance. In multivariable analysis, prior adherence to CRC surveillance was associated with a decreased risk of presenting with advanced-stage CRC (vs. early-stage CRC) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.85; P = .029).

The majority of patients who developed CRC in the setting of UC underwent inadequate surveillance, and they were more likely to present with advanced-stage CRC.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to patients without IBD. There is a lack of population-based data evaluating the in-patient surgical outcomes of CRC in IBD patients. We sought to compare the hospital outcomes of CRC surgery between patients with and without IBD.

We used the National Inpatient Sample (2008-2012) and Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD, 2013) and selected all adult patients (age ≥18 years) with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) who underwent CRC surgery. Multivariate analysis for in-patient outcomes of postoperative complications, health-care resource utilization, readmission rate, and mortality were performed.

A total of 397,847 patients underwent CRC surgery from 2008 to 2012, of which 0.8% (3,242) had IBD. Compared to CRC in non-IBD patients, CRC in IBD patients had longer length of stay (adjusted coefficient (AC) 0.86 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42, 1.30), more likely developed postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.26, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.50), including postoperative infection (AOR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.38) and deep vein thrombosis (AOR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.36, 4.28), and more frequently required blood transfusion (AOR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.94). CRC in IBD patients was more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (AOR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.04).

At a population level, IBD adversely impacts outcomes at the time of CRC surgery.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), a devastating complication of which intestinal dysplasia is the precursor. Considerable progress has been made to determine CRC risk in IBD, identification & management of dysplasia and preventative methods. Traditionally, surveillance colonoscopies with random colonic biopsies was used. However recent data suggests that chromoendoscopy is a better method of surveillance. Using 5-aminosalicylic acid agents primarily for chemoprevention is an ongoing debate however, when prescribed along with other strategies to control inflammation, their use is considered of benefit. This review presents current understanding of risk factors of neoplasia focusing on dysplasia and preventive strategies. Areas covered: PubMed search was done using key words to assess current evidence. Along with genetics, risk factors, strategies that modify the risk of dysplasia, and CRC in IBD are discussed in detail. Expert commentary: The role of our strategies in modifying CRC risk needs further assessment. Future research should aim to fill knowledge gaps such as high quality evidence for Chromoendoscopy and development of molecular markers for dysplasia detection. Our ultimate goal would be to eliminate CRC and is possible by better understanding of key pathogenic mechanisms in IBD.

The risk of developing colorectal cancer is higher in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) than in the general population. Guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy (SCS) to reduce mortality; however, few studies have assessed physicians' adherence to guidelines. This study was aimed to clarify the current status of SCS and adherence to guidelines through the characteristics of cancer/dysplasia surveillance for UC patients in Japan.

A questionnaire was mailed to 541 physicians who attended meetings on inflammatory bowel disease.

The respondents encountered a median of 100 UC cases. Thirty percent of the respondents had never managed a UC patient with cancer. Fifty-one percent of the respondents had never diagnosed colorectal cancer with UC. Forty-seven percent of the respondents considered extensive colitis and left-sided colitis as indications for SCS, and 38% carried out SCS regardless of the disease extent. Sixty-three percent of the respondents started SCS at 7-10 years after UC onset, whereas 20% started SCS at 3 years or less. Fifty-two percent of the respondents obtained targeted biopsies only, and chromoendoscopy was used by 49% of the respondents as a special technique for surveillance. Median number of biopsies at SCS was five per patient; it was three among patients whose biopsy was carried out by physicians who obtained targeted biopsies only and seven among those carried out by physicians who obtained step biopsies and targeted biopsies (P < 0.0001).

A considerable proportion of the respondents did not follow the guidelines when selecting patients for surveillance and carrying out SCS.

Colitis-associated cancer (CAC) represents a concrete risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with long lasting inflammatory bowel diseases. Surveillance colonoscopy is a rapidly evolving research field with profound changes from the traditional approach based on scheduled controls and random biopsy protocols. Areas covered: A literature search was performed using PubMed/Embase to review the latest evidence supporting the need for surveillance colonoscopy. By focusing on the most promising recent advances in this field, we provide a state-of-the-art overview of the current gold standards for the diagnosis and management of colitis-associated dysplasia. Expert commentary: Evidence-based and emerging data have questioned the efficacy and effectiveness of both standard surveillance colonoscopy and random biopsy protocols. The latest guidelines endorse early initiation of surveillance programs, risk-profiling assessment of colonoscopy intervals and standardized use of advanced imaging modalities to detect early dysplasia. Current trends clearly reveal increased attention to direct visualization and endoscopic management of visible dysplastic lesions, even in patients with longstanding colitis. Emerging technological advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy are expected to change the endoscopic surveillance protocols in the near future.

Although evidence-based guidelines have been developed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the extent to which they are followed is unclear. The objective of this study was to review clinicians' adherence to international IBD guidelines.

Retrospective data collection of patients attending a tertiary Australian hospital IBD clinic over a 12-month period. Management practices were audited and compared to ECCO (European Crohn's and Colitis Organization) guidelines.

Data from 288 patients were collected: 47% (136/288) male; mean age 43; 140/288 (49%) patients had ulcerative colitis (UC); 145/288 (50%) patients had Crohn's disease (CD); 3/288 (1%) patients had IBD-unclassified (IBD-U). Patient care was undertaken by gastroenterologists, trainees and general practitioners.

Overall adherence to disease management guidelines occurred in 204/288 (71%) of patient encounters. Discrepancies between guidelines and management were found in: 25/80 (31%) of patients with UC in remission receiving oral 5-aminosalicyclates (5-ASAs) as maintenance therapy, and; 46/110 (42%) of patients with small bowel and/or ileo-cecal CD receiving 5-ASA. Preventive Care: Adherence to ≥1 additional component of preventive care was observed in 73/288 (25%) of patient encounters: 12/133 (9%) on thiopurines underwent annual skin checks; 61/288 (21%) of patients with IBD underwent a bone scan; 46/288 (16%) patients were reminded to have their influenza vaccine. Psychological care: Assessment of psychological wellbeing was undertaken in only 16/288 (6%) of patients.

There remains a gap between adherence to international guidelines and clinical practice. Standardizing practice using evidence-based clinical pathways may be a strategy towards improving the quality of IBD outpatient management.

Several reports documented an inefficient utilisation of available resources, as well as a suboptimal compliance with surveillance recommendations. Although, evidence suggests that organisational issues can influence the quality of care delivered, surveillance protocols are usually based on non-organized approaches.

We conducted a literature search (publication date: 01/2000-06/2016) on PubMed and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for guidelines, or consensus statements, for surveys of practice, reporting information about patients, or providers attitudes and behaviours, for intervention studies to enhance compliance with guidelines. Related articles were also scrutinised. Based on the clinical relevance and burden on endoscopy services this review was focused on surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus, IBD and post-polypectomy surveillance of colonic adenomas.

Existing guidelines are generally recognising structure and process requirements influencing delivery of surveillance interventions, while less attention had been devoted to transitions and interfaces in the care process. Available evidence from practice surveys is suggesting the need to design organizational strategies aimed to enable patients to attend and providers to deliver timely and appropriate care. Well designed studies assessing the effectiveness of specific interventions in this setting are however lacking. Indirect evidence from screening settings would suggest that the implementation of automated standardized recall systems, utilisation of clinical registries, removing financial barriers, could improve appropriateness of use and compliance with recommendations.

Lack of sound evidence regarding utility and methodology of surveillance can contribute to explain the observed variability in providers and patients attitudes and in compliance with the recommended surveillance.

Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) characterized by recurrent episodes of mucosal inflammation. This chronic mucosal inflammation has several potential consequences, one of which is the occurrence of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Over the past decade, our understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and overall approach to diagnosing and managing colitis-associated colorectal cancer has grown considerably. In the current review article, we outline these advancements and highlight areas in need of further research. Cancer Prev Res; 9(12); 887-94. ©2016 AACR.

To investigate knowledge and fear of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

A 12-item self-administered questionnaire, developed after a careful literature review, was administered to all consecutive IBD patients treated with infliximab who were followed up at Nancy University Hospital (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France) between February and May 2012.

Altogether 100 patients including 72 with Crohn's disease (CD) were included. Only 7.0% of patients spontaneously mentioned CRC risk as a main feature of IBD and 37.0% as a potential IBD complication. CRC was the most feared complication by 26 patients [ulcerative colitis (UC) 46.4% vs CD 18.1%, P < 0.01]. Two-thirds of patients knew that IBD increases CRC risk (UC 81.9% vs CD 57.1%, P = 0.02). Their main source of information was their gastroenterologist (52.0%). On the best screening method for CRC, 86.0% of the respondents mentioned colonoscopy. Only 32.0% of patients knew that it has to be performed 10 years after diagnosis. In case of dysplasia, 51.0% of the patients would not undergo colectomy (CD 59.7% vs UC 28.6%, P < 0.01), mainly due to the fear of having ostomy bags. Only one-quarter of UC patients were aware of the chemopreventive effect of 5-aminosalicylates on CRC risk.

Two-thirds of IBD patients are aware of the risk of CRC. UC patients have a better knowledge of this risk and are more afraid of this complication. Our results underscore the need for therapeutic education about CRC in IBD patients.

The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed since the mid-1990s (e.g., use of thiopurines/anti-TNFα agents, improved surveillance programs), possibly affecting cancer risk. To establish current cancer risk in IBD, updates are warranted from cohorts covering this time span, and detailed enough to study associations with phenotype and medication. We studied intestinal-, extra-intestinal- and overall cancer risk in the Dutch population-based IBDSL cohort. In total, 1,157 Crohn's disease (CD) and 1,644 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients were diagnosed between 1991 and 2011, and followed until 2013. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for CD and UC separately, as well as for gender-, phenotype-, disease duration-, diagnosis era- and medication groups. We found an increased risk for colorectal cancer in CD patients with colon involvement (SIR 2.97; 95% CI 1.08-6.46), but not in the total CD or UC population. In addition, CD patients were at increased risk for hematologic- (2.41; 1.04-4.76), overall skin- (1.55; 1.06-2.19), skin squamous cell- (SCC; 3.83; 1.83-7.04) and overall cancer (1.28; 1.01-1.60), whereas UC patients had no increased risk for extra-intestinal- and overall cancer. Finally, in a medication analysis on CD and UC together, long-term immunosuppression exposure (>12 months) was associated with an increased risk for hematologic cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, SCC and overall cancer, and this increase was mainly attributed to thiopurines. IBD patients with long-term immunosuppression exposure can be considered as having a higher cancer risk, and our data support the advice in recent IBD guidelines to consider skin cancer screening in these patients.

Colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia (CRN) is a well-known complication of chronic inflammation of the colon either with ulcerative colitis (UC) or colonic Crohn's disease (CD). Studies have shown that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have an overall higher risk for colorectal dysplasia and cancer compared to the general population and this risk is further increased by certain associated factors, including extent of disease, duration of disease, and age at onset. In addition, other risk factors not related to IBD can also further increase the risk for CRN, such as a family history of sporadic colon cancer and a concomitant diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. The society guidelines mostly agree on the appropriate time to begin CRN surveillance but vary somewhat on the appropriate intervals between surveillance colonoscopies. In addition, there is not yet a consensus on the appropriate method for surveillance. In this review, we discuss the risk for CRN in colonic IBD, the associated factors that further increase the risk for CRN, the current surveillance guidelines and the current methods available for CRN surveillance.

The association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal cancer (CRC) has been widely shown. This association is responsible for 10% to 15% of deaths in patients with IBD, even if according to some studies, the risk of developing CRC seems to be decreased. An adequate surveillance of patients identified as at-risk patients, might improve the management of IBD-CRC risk. In this article we review the literature data related to IBD-CRC, analyze potential risk factors such as severity of inflammation, duration, and extent of IBD, age at diagnosis, sex, family history of sporadic CRC, and coexistent primary sclerosing cholangitis, and update epidemiology on the basis of new studies. Confirmed risk factors for IBD-CRC are severity, extent, and duration of colitis, the presence of coexistent primary sclerosing cholangitis, and a family history of CRC. Current evidence-based guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy for patients with colitis 8 to 10 years after diagnosis, further surveillance is decided on the basis of patient risk factors. The classic white light endoscopy, with random biopsies, is now considered unsatisfactory. The evolution of technology has led to the development of new techniques that promise to increase the effectiveness of the monitoring programs. Chromoendoscopy has already proved highly effective and several guidelines suggest its use with a target biopsy. Confocal endomicroscopy and autofluorescence imaging are currently being tested and for this reason they have not yet been considered as useful in surveillance programs.

Colonoscopy is a frequently performed diagnostic and therapeutic test and the primary screening tool in several nationalized bowel cancer screening programs. There has been a considerable focus on maximizing the utility of colonoscopy. This has occurred in four key areas: Optimizing patient selection to reduce unnecessary or low yield colonoscopy has offered cost-benefit improvements in population screening. Improving quality assurance, through the development of widely accepted quality metrics for use in individual practice and the research setting, has offered measurable improvements in colonoscopic yield. Significant improvements have been demonstrated in colonoscopic technique, from the administration of preparation to the techniques employed during withdrawal of the colonoscope. Improved techniques to avoid post-procedural complications have also been developed-further maximizing the utility of colonoscopy. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent evidence-based advances in colonoscopic practice that contribute to the optimal practice of colonoscopy.

The regional availability of specialized physicians is an important aspect in healthcare of patients with IBD. The association between physician density and healthcare is not yet clear. Most studies did not consider district type, which reflects population density. Our research question was, "Do specialist density and district type influence the healthcare of IBD patients in Germany?"

We combined a claims dataset from a German health insurance fund with population and physician data. Four main aspects were investigated: regular specialist visits, drug therapies, surveillance colonoscopy, and IBD-related hospitalizations. Various regression analyses were performed.

The study cohort was comprised of 21,771 individuals, including 9282 patients with Crohn disease and 12,489 patients with ulcerative colitis. Patients who were living in districts with higher specialist densities were more likely to attend specialist visits on a regular basis. No difference in the frequencies of TNF-alpha inhibitor therapies was found. However, individuals from urban areas were more likely to receive a permanent immunosuppressive therapy with continuous specialist support.

The results revealed that some aspects had positive effects on the probability of implementing healthcare in accordance with pathways and guidelines. No clear evidence of a general healthcare undersupply in rural areas was found.

Early detection of neoplastic lesions is essential in patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis but the best technique of colonoscopy still is controversial.

We performed a prospective multicenter study in patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis. Two colonoscopies were performed in each patient within 3 weeks to 3 months. In white-light (WL) colonoscopy, stepwise random biopsy specimens (4 biopsy specimens every 10 cm), segmental random biopsies (2 biopsy specimens in 5 segments), and targeted biopsy specimens were taken. In NBI colonoscopy, segmental and targeted biopsy specimens were taken. The sequence of WL and NBI colonoscopy was randomized.

In 36 of 159 patients enrolled (22.6%), 54 lesions with intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) were found (51 low-grade, 3 high-grade). In WL colonoscopy we found 11 IN in stepwise biopsy specimens, 4 in segmental biopsy specimens, and 15 in targeted biopsy specimens. In NBI colonoscopy 7 IN were detected in segmental biopsy specimens and 24 IN were detected in targeted biopsy specimens. Almost all IN were found with one technique alone (κ value of WL vs NBI, -0.86; P < .001). Statistically equivalent numbers of IN were found in NBI colonoscopy with targeted and segmental biopsy specimens as in WL colonoscopy with targeted and stepwise biopsy specimens, but with fewer biopsy specimens (11.9 vs 38.6 biopsy specimens, respectively; P < .001), and less withdrawal time was necessary (23 vs 13 min, respectively; P < .001).

Stepwise biopsy specimens are indispensable in WL colonoscopy. The combination of targeted and segmental biopsy specimens in the NBI technique is as sensitive as targeted together with stepwise biopsy specimens in WL colonoscopy, but requires fewer biopsy specimens and less time. The highest sensitivity should be reached by combining the WL and NBI techniques by switching between the modes.

Dysplasia surveillance is recognized as an integral component in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The adherence to surveillance guidelines is variable, and understanding of quality indicators and predictors of behavior is currently limited.

To perform a nationwide evaluation of the quality of IBD surveillance practiced by Australian endoscopists and to determine the predictors of quality practice.

Cross-sectional nationwide survey.

Survey distributed through the gastroenterology and colorectal surgery societies covering knowledge and practice of IBD surveillance.

Adherence to indicators of high-quality surveillance and median score of IBD surveillance guideline knowledge.

A total of 264 responses were received, comprising 240 respondents who perform surveillance screening (218 gastroenterologists, 46 colorectal surgeons). Gastroenterologists were significantly more likely to undertake surveillance (P < .001), adhere to guidelines (P = .02), use advanced imaging modalities (P = .04), and have greater surveillance knowledge than colorectal surgeons (P < .001). Knowledge score and gastroenterologists were independent predictors of dysplasia screening (odds ratio [OR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-1.96 and OR 11.2; 95% CI, 4.53-27.87), guideline adherence (OR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31 and OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.11-5.30), and advanced endoscopic imaging technique use (OR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35 and OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.02-4.74).

Potential responder bias results appear, however, aligned with those of previous studies.

IBD dysplasia surveillance in Australia is being performed at a high standard. Gastroenterology specialization and knowledge score have been demonstrated to be strong predictors of high-quality surveillance practice. This is the first study to determine predictors of screening behavior and quantify surveillance quality. These results further emphasize that gastroenterologists should play a key role in IBD surveillance.

Surveillance is recommended for patients with long-term inflammatory bowel disease because they have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). To study the effectiveness of surveillance, we determined the incidence of CRC after negative findings from surveillance colonoscopies (interval CRC).

We collected data from 1273 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease, enrolled in a surveillance program at 7 hospitals in The Netherlands, who underwent 4327 surveillance colonoscopies from January 1, 2000, through January 1, 2014. Patients were followed up from their first surveillance colonoscopy until the last surveillance colonoscopy, colectomy, or CRC. Factors that might have contributed to the occurrence of CRC were categorized as inadequate procedures (ie, inadequate bowel preparation), inadequate surveillance (CRC occurring outside the appropriate surveillance interval), or inadequate management of dysplasia (CRC diagnosed in the same colonic segment as a previous diagnosis of dysplasia). The remaining CRC cases were classified as true interval CRCs.

CRC was diagnosed in 17 patients (1.3%), with an incidence of 2.5 per 1000 years of follow-up evaluation. Factors that might account for the occurrence of CRC were identified in 12 patients (70%). These were inadequate colonoscopies in 4 patients (24%), inadequate surveillance intervals in 9 patients (53%), and inadequate management of dysplasia in 2 patients (12%). The remaining 5 cases of CRC (30%) were classified as true interval CRCs.

In a retrospective analysis of patients with inflammatory bowel disease participating in a surveillance program, the incidence of CRC was only 1%, which supports the implementation of longer surveillance intervals. However, the fact that 30% of CRC cases were interval cancers indicates the need for variable surveillance intervals based on risk factors for CRC.

Patients with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involving large intestine proximal to rectum are considered to be at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). One prior study showed low utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ≥ 8 years of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the USA.

To study use of surveillance colonoscopy among Medicare beneficiaries with IBD in the 2-year period prior to CRC diagnosis.

Our study sample included Medicare beneficiaries in the SEER-Medicare-linked database who were diagnosed with CRC during 2001-2005 and had ≥ 3 physician visits with ICD-9 diagnosis code for IBD prior to CRC diagnosis. Medicare beneficiaries aged >85 years without Part B coverage or enrolled in HMOs were excluded. Colonoscopy performed within 6-30 months prior to CRC diagnosis was defined as surveillance colonoscopy. The χ² test and multivariate logistic regression were used in statistical analysis.

Of 241 Medicare beneficiaries with IBD and diagnosed with CRC, 92 (38%) patients underwent ≥ 1 surveillance colonoscopy in the 2 years prior to cancer diagnosis. The use of surveillance colonoscopy was similar between Crohn's disease (28/86, 33%) and UC (64/155, 41%). In multivariate logistic regression, older age (odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-0.99) was negative associated with surveillance colonoscopy use and personal history of colon polyp (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.09-6.87) was positively associated with surveillance colonoscopy use.

Use of surveillance colonoscopy was low among Medicare beneficiaries with IBD in the 2 years prior to CRC diagnosis.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Chromoendoscopy showed superiority to conventional colonoscopy (CC) in surveillance studies including high-risk patients. We aimed to compare chromoendoscopy-guided endomicroscopy (CGE) with CC for intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) detection in patients with longstanding UC without primary sclerosing cholangitis and/or history of IN.

One hundred sixty-two patients with longstanding (≥ 8 yr) distal/extensive UC and without primary sclerosing cholangitis and/or history of IN were prospectively randomized to undergo CGE (group A) or CC (group B). Seventeen patients were excluded. In group A (n = 72), circumscribed lesions highlighted by pan-chromoendoscopy were evaluated by endomicroscopy, and targeted biopsy/polypectomy was performed. In group B (n = 73), 4 random biopsies every 10 cm and targeted biopsy/polypectomy of detected lesions were performed.

Thirteen IN, all low grade, were detected: 7 IN in group A and 6 in group B (P > 0.05), distributed, respectively, by 6 and 4 patients (P > 0.05). Significantly, more biopsies were performed in group B (4.7 ± 4.9 versus 36.0 ± 6.2, P < 0.001), and the per-biopsy yield of IN was higher in group A (1/48 versus 1/438, P < 0.001). Examination time was 61.5 ± 15.6 minutes in group A and 40.7 ± 8.7 minutes in group B (P < 0.001). The IN detection by endomicroscopy revealed: sensitivity = 85.7%, specificity = 97.9%, positive predictive value = 75.0%, and negative predictive value = 98.9%.

CGE does not improve the detection of IN in the endoscopic screening of patients with longstanding UC without primary sclerosing cholangitis and/or history of IN. CGE takes longer than CC, but it decreases the number of biopsies performed and significantly increases the per-biopsy yield of IN. Endomicroscopy is an accurate tool for IN detection.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) are important biomarkers of sporadic CRC risk. Their correlation with the risk of intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) in UC remains unclear.

To assess whether ACF are a risk factor for IN in long-standing UC and to investigate any correlation between the clinico-epidemiological characteristics and prevalence/number of ACF in these patients.

Seventy-six patients with long-standing UC were prospectively screened by colonoscopy with chromoendoscopy-guided endomicroscopy. ACF were sought in the lower rectum.

Eight INs were detected in seven (9.2%) patients. The ACF prevalence and mean number were 60.5% and 2.4 ± 2.8, respectively. The number of ACF was independently associated with the risk of having IN (odds ratio = 1.338; 95% confidence interval 1.030-1.738). ACF number revealed a good calibration (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.829) and discriminative ability (p = 0.205, Hosmer-Lemeshow test) for the prediction of synchronous IN. Patients with ≥3 ACF have a significantly higher prevalence of IN than patients with <3 ACF (22.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). Using this cut-off value, the performance of ACF in predicting the presence of IN was as follows: sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 65.2%, positive predictive value = 22.6%, and negative predictive value = 100%. Age >40 years, family history of CRC, and increased body mass index (BMI) were associated with a significantly higher number of ACF.

Long-standing UC patients with ≥3 ACF have a significantly higher likelihood of having IN. Age >40 years, family history of CRC, and increased BMI have significant positive associations with the number of ACF.

Physician adherence to guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often poor. This may lead to adverse patient outcomes and excess endoscopic workload.

To assess the attitudes and practice of IBD specialists in a tertiary centre towards colonoscopic surveillance.

First, a questionnaire evaluating attitudes and approach to CRC surveillance was issued to 36 clinicians at one tertiary referral hospital. Second, a retrospective audit of IBD surveillance colonoscopy practice over a 2-year period was performed.

Questionnaire response rate was 97%. Sixty-nine per cent of respondents were aware of, and used, Australian guidelines. Surveillance was undertaken by all clinicians in patients with extensive colitis, 83% in patients with left-sided colitis and 51% in patients with proctitis. Seventy-six per cent used chromoendoscopy, and 47% took 10 to 20 random biopsies. Colectomy was considered appropriate in 0% for unifocal low-grade dysplasia, 35% for multifocal low-grade dysplasia and 83% for high-grade dysplasia. Sixty-six per cent would remove elevated dysplastic lesions endoscopically. The audit identified 103 surveillance colonoscopies in 81 patients. Chromoendoscopy was used in 21% of cases, and the median number of random biopsies was 13. Sixty-two per cent of colonoscopies were performed outside the guidelines in relation to colonoscopic frequency. Following colonoscopy, an appropriate recommendation for subsequent surveillance was documented in 40% of cases.

Knowledge and practice of CRC surveillance in IBD vary among specialist clinicians and often deviate from guidelines. Many clinicians perform surveillance earlier and more frequently than recommended. These findings have implications for patient outcomes and workload.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a condition at increased risk for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) development. Nowadays, screening and follow-up programs are routinely performed worldwide to promote the early detection of CRCs in subjects with well known risk factors (extent, duration and severity of the disorder). The diffusion of these procedures is presumably the main reason for the marked reduction of cancer incidence and mortality in the course of UC. In addition, chemoprevention has been widely investigated and developed in many medical fields, and aspirin has shown a preventive effect against CRC, while mesalazine has been strongly invoked as a potential chemopreventive agent in UC. However, available studies show some limitations due to the obvious ethical implications of drug withdrawal in UC in order to design a control group. The estrogen receptors (ER) alpha/beta balance seems to have a relevant influence on colorectal carcinogenesis and ER beta appears to parallel apoptosis, and hence an anti-carcinogenic effect. Phytoestrogens are compounds acting as ER beta agonists and have shown a promising chemopreventive effect on sporadic as well as genetically inherited CRC. There is evidence suggesting a role for ERs in UC-related carcinogenesis. In this perspective, since these substances can be considered as dietary supplements and are completely free from side effects, phytoestrogens could be an interesting option for CRC prevention, even when the disease is a consequence of long-term chronic inflammation, as in the course of UC. Further studies of their effects are warranted in both the basic research and clinical fields.

Chromoendoscopy utilizes colorimetric techniques to increase detection of lesions that are difficult to see or cannot be seen with conventional white light endoscopy. Multiple studies have demonstrated that chromoendoscopy with dye spraying significantly increases the detection of dysplastic lesions in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) of the colon undergoing colonoscopy. Furthermore, chromoendoscopy may obviate the need for random biopsies and pending additional studies and may allow increased intervals between surveillance exams, reducing costs while increasing the sensitivity for detection of dysplasia per exam. Despite convincing data supporting the use of chromoendoscopy for IBD colonic surveillance, it is seldom utilized outside of academic centers. Here, we review the current approach to colorectal cancer surveillance in IBD focusing on the data supporting the use of chromoendoscopy including its use in a community setting and offer practical recommendations for incorporating chromoendoscopy as a routine part of surveillance in IBD regardless of practice setting.

Interval colorectal cancers (CRCs) may account for approximately one half of all CRCs identified during IBD surveillance. The etiology of interval CRCs is multifactorial, with procedural factors likely to play a major role. Molecular events promoted by inflamed mucosa may augment the cancer risk and perhaps explain some interval CRCs. This article reviews key studies relating to CRC risk in the patient with IBD, paying particular attention to the occurrence of interval CRCs. The most common factors implicated in the etiology of interval CRCs, in particular missed, incompletely resected lesions, the adherence to recommended surveillance intervals and biologic pathways associated with a faster progression to cancer are examined. Basic concepts for quality and effectiveness of colonoscopic surveillance in IBD are summarized.

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are at increased risk of colon dysplasia. The role of random vs. target biopsies in these patients has not been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the yield and clinical impact of random biopsies during surveillance colonoscopies in patients with PSC-UC.

Data from 71 patients (267 colonoscopies) with PSC and UC, who underwent surveillance colonoscopies and followed-up from 2001 to 2011 was obtained. Colonoscopy and pathology reports were reviewed to assess the yield of random biopsies.

A total of 3975 (median 12) random biopsies were taken during surveillance colonoscopies. Overall, neoplasia was detected in 22 colonoscopies (16 patients): in 8 colonoscopies (36.4%) by targeted biopsies only and in 4 (18.2%) by both targeted and random biopsies. Neoplasia was detected in random biopsies only in 10 (45.5%) colonoscopies in 8 patients. On multivariate analysis, duration of UC (Odds ratio [OR]=1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.81; P=0.01), number of random biopsies (per increase by 8) (OR=1.64; 95% CI, 1.18-2.28; P=0.003) and target biopsies during colonoscopy (OR=9.08; 95% CI, 3.18-26.0; P<0.001) independently predicted the presence of dysplasia; endoscopic features of prior inflammation did not.

Random biopsies significantly increase the yield of dysplasia in patients with PSC and UC even in the absence of endoscopic features of prior inflammation and significantly impact clinical outcomes.

Recent innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy have changed our traditional approach to diagnosis and therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). While traditionally used dye-based chromoendoscopy (DBC) techniques suffer from several limitations that reduce their utility in daily routine practice, newer 'dye-less' chromoendoscopy (DLC) techniques offer a great potential to overcome most of these limitations.

To review available optical and digital chromoendoscopy techniques, by critically discussing their potential for diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy in patients with IBD.

A literature search on the use of dye-less and dye-based chromoendoscopy in IBD patients was performed.

In long-standing IBD, DBC improves detection of dysplasia (diagnostic odds ratio = 17.5, 95% CI = 1.2-247.1) as well as prediction of inflammatory disease activity and extent of disease compared with standard video-colonoscopy. Narrow band imaging (NBI) shows no improvement in dysplasia detection rates compared with white-light endoscopy and DBC (P = 0.6). Moreover, NBI results in a suboptimal differentiation of dysplastic from nondysplastic lesions. No data regarding digital DLC techniques (i.e. FICE, i-scan) for dysplasia detection in IBD are yet available. Both NBI and i-scan are superior to white-light endoscopy in assessing the activity and extent of colorectal IBD.

Although the potential benefits of newer optical and digital dye-less chromoendoscopy techniques over traditionally used DBC are substantial, only DBC can currently be recommended to improve dysplasia detection in long-standing IBD. In contrast, DLC has the potential to quantify disease activity and mucosal healing in IBD.