1
|
Karabicak I, Yildirim K, Gursel MF, Malazgirt Z. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:3078-3083. [PMID: 39575276 PMCID: PMC11577399 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Single incision laparoscopic liver resection (SILLR) is the most recent development in the laparoscopic approach to the liver. SILLR for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has developed much more slowly than multiport LLR. So far, 195 patients completed SILLR for HCC. In this paper, we reviewed all published papers about SILLR for HCC and discussed the feasibility of the SILLR, peri and postoperative findings, tricks of patient selection and whether SILLR compromise the oncological principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilhan Karabicak
- Department of General Surgery, Samsun VM Medicalpark Hospital, Samsun 55200, Türkiye
| | - Kadir Yildirim
- Department of General Surgery, Samsun VM Medicalpark Hospital, Samsun 55200, Türkiye
| | - Mahmut Fikret Gursel
- Department of General Surgery, Samsun VM Medicalpark Hospital, Samsun 55200, Türkiye
| | - Zafer Malazgirt
- Department of General Surgery, Samsun VM Medicalpark Hospital, Samsun 55200, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chuang SH, Chuang SC. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery to treat hepatopancreatobiliary cancer: A technical review. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:3359-3369. [PMID: 36158268 PMCID: PMC9346466 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), or laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, was launched to minimize incisional traumatic effects in the 1990s. Minor SILS, such as cholecystectomies, have been gaining in popularity over the past few decades. Its application in complicated hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeries, however, has made slow progress due to instrumental and technical limitations, costs, and safety concerns. While minimally invasive abdominal surgery is pushing the boundaries, advanced laparoscopic HPB surgeries have been shown to be comparable to open operations in terms of patient and oncologic safety, including hepatectomies, distal pancreatectomies (DP), and pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD). In contrast, advanced SILS for HPB malignancy has only been reported in a few small case series. Most of the procedures involved minor liver resections and DP; major hepatectomies were rarely described. Single-incision laparoscopic PD has not yet been reported. We herein review the published SILS for HPB cancer in the literature and our three-year experience focusing on the technical aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Hung Chuang
- Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chang Chuang
- Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Is Single-Incision Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Safe and Efficient for the Treatment of Malignant Hepatic Tumors? A Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 51:425-432. [PMID: 31388921 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-019-00285-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this review was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of single-incision laparoscopic liver surgery (SILLS) for malignant liver lesions. METHODS A retrospective review of the Medline database was performed, including studies published up to February 2019. RESULTS Overall, 69 patients (50 males) with a median age of 61 years (range, 31-90) from 16 studies underwent SILLS for malignant liver disease and were included in this review. The majority of patients underwent resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 52, 75 %), followed by metastatic disease (n = 15, 22 %). The hepatic lesions were located in anterolateral liver segments in 62 patients (90 %) and in posterosuperior liver segments in 7 patients (10 %). Sixty-five patients (94 %) underwent minor liver resection. The median blood loss was 200 mL (range 0-2500), while 4 patients that underwent single-port resection were converted to either conventional laparoscopy or open resections. Two cases were reported to be associated with postoperative complications in the single-port group (1 [1.7 %] grade Dindo-Clavien I-II, 1 [1.7 %] grade Dindo-Clavien III-IV), while no complications were noted in the multiport group. All patients successfully underwent R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS SILLS seems to be a safe and efficient treatment modality for malignant liver disease when performed by experienced surgeons in carefully selected patients. More studies are needed to better identify which patients may benefit from such an operative approach.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chatzizacharias NA, Dajani K, Koong JK, Jah A. The Role of the Single Incision Laparoscopic Approach in Liver and Pancreatic Resectional Surgery. Minim Invasive Surg 2016; 2016:1454026. [PMID: 27891251 PMCID: PMC5116530 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1454026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 10/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained increasing support over the last few years. The aim of this narrative review is to analyse the published evidence on the use and potential benefits of SILS in hepatic and pancreatic resectional surgery for benign and malignant pathology. Methods. Pubmed and Embase databases were searched using the search terms "single incision laparoscopic", "single port laparoscopic", "liver surgery", and "pancreas surgery". Results. Twenty relevant manuscripts for liver and 9 for pancreatic SILS resections were identified. With regard to liver surgery, despite the lack of comparative studies with other minimal invasive techniques, outcomes have been acceptable when certain limitations are taken into account. For pancreatic resections, when compared to the conventional laparoscopic approach, SILS produced comparable results with regard to intra- and postoperative parameters, including length of hospitalisation and complications. Similarly, the results were comparable to robotic pancreatectomies, with the exception of the longer operative time reported with the robotic approach. Discussion. Despite the limitations, the published evidence supports that SILS is safe and feasible for liver and pancreatic resections when performed by experienced teams in the tertiary setting. However, no substantial benefit has been identified yet, especially compared to other minimal invasive techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos A. Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Khaled Dajani
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jun Kit Koong
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yao DB, Wu SD. Application of stapling devices in liver surgery: Current status and future prospects. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:7091-7098. [PMID: 27610019 PMCID: PMC4988303 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i31.7091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver is a vascular-rich solid organ. Safe and effective dissection of the vessels and liver parenchyma, and control of intraoperative bleeding are the main concerns when performing liver resection. Several studies have confirmed that intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion are predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality in liver surgery. Various methods and instruments have been developed during hepatectomy. Stapling devices are crucial for safe and rapid anastomosis. They are used to divide hepatic veins and portal branches, and to transect liver parenchyma in open liver resection. In recent years, laparoscopic liver surgery has developed rapidly, and is now preferred by many surgeons. Stapling devices have also been gradually introduced in laparoscopic liver surgery, from dividing vascular and biliary structures to parenchymal transection. This may be because staplers make manipulation more simple, rapid and safe. Even in single incision laparoscopic surgery, which is recognized as a new minimally invasive technique, staplers are also utilized, especially in left lateral hepatectomy. For safe application of stapling devices in liver surgery, more related designs and modifications, such as application of a suitable laparoscopic articulating liver tissue crushing device, a staple line reinforcement technique with the absorbable polymer membrane or radiofrequency ablation assistance, are still needed. More randomized studies are needed to demonstrate the benefits and find broader indications for the use of stapling devices, to help expand their application in liver surgery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Karabicak I, Karabulut K. Single port laparoscopic liver surgery: A minireview. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8:444-50. [PMID: 27358670 PMCID: PMC4919693 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i12.444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, the trend is to perform surgeries with "scarless" incisions. In light of this, the single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) technique is rapidly becoming widespread due to its lack of invasiveness and its cosmetic advantages, as the only entry point is usually hidden in the umbilicus. The interest in "scarless" liver resections did not grow as rapidly as the interest in other scarless surgeries. Hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons are reluctant to operate a malignant lesion through a narrow incision with limited exposure. There are concerns over adverse oncological outcomes for single-port laparoscopic liver resections (SPL-LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, getting familiar with using the operating instruments through a narrow incision with limited exposure is very challenging. In this article, we reviewed the published literature to describe history, indications, contraindications, ideal patients for new beginners, technical difficulty, advantages, disadvantages, oncological concern and the future of SPL-LR.
Collapse
|
7
|
Single-Port Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Largest Turkish Experience. Indian J Surg 2016; 79:111-115. [PMID: 28442836 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1435-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-port laparoscopic surgery has the advantage of a hidden scar and reduced abdominal wall trauma. Although single-port laparoscopic surgery is widely performed for other organs, its application is very limited for liver resection. Here, we report our experience with nine patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic liver resection. Nine patients underwent single-port laparoscopic liver resection for the indications of hydatid cyst, hepatocellular carcinoma, and colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Nine patients were successfully treated with single-port laparoscopic surgery. The operative time was between 60 and 240 min. The only operative complication was bleeding up to 650 mL in a patient with cirrhosis. No postoperative complications occurred. All patients were discharged earlier than usual. Single-port laparoscopic liver surgery is a challenging surgery. Surgeon with the experience of laparoscopic liver surgery should perform the single-port laparoscopic liver surgery. It is technically feasible with a good outcome in well-selected patients. Initial cases must be benign lesions to avoid jeopardizing oncological safety.
Collapse
|
8
|
Miyata R, Kameyama N, Tomita M, Mitsuhashi H, Baba S, Amemiya R, Amada E. Transumbilical glove port: A cost-effective method for single-incision laparoscopic hepatectomy. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2015; 3:2050313X14568699. [PMID: 27489679 PMCID: PMC4857323 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x14568699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Emerging concepts of “reduced port surgery” have gained considerable attention from laparoscopic surgeons, including the field of liver resection. To date, 86 cases of single-incision laparoscopic hepatectomy (SILH) have been reported, with commercially available access devices being used in most of these cases. We report herein a use of homemade transumbilical glove port for SILH. Methods: A 39-year-old woman represented giant hepatic hemangioma (9-cm in size) located at the left lateral segment (S2/3). Partial hepatectomy was performed by the glove method via single port access with conventional laparoscopic bipolar forceps, grasper and scissors without the need of any single-port specific devices. Results: The operative time was 77 minutes, and intraoperative blood loss was 50 mL. The postoperative course was uneventful. Conclusions: Glove method not only has significant advantages in terms of cost, but also is superior in its versatility, allowing wider range of movements compared to conventional access devices. Taking in consideration its cost effectiveness and versatility, glove method may be a good option for SILH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - En Amada
- International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mittermair C, Schirnhofer J, Brunner E, Pimpl K, Obrist C, Weiss M, Weiss HG. Single port laparoscopy in gastroenterology and hepatology: A fine step forward. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:15599-15607. [PMID: 25400443 PMCID: PMC4229524 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2013] [Accepted: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Single incision laparoscopy (SIL) has become an emerging technology aiming at a further reduction of abdominal wall trauma in minimally invasive surgery. Available data is encouraging for the safe application of standardized SIL in a wide range of procedures in gastroenterology and hepatology. Compared to technically simple SIL procedures, the merit of SIL in advanced surgeries, such as liver or colorectal interventions, compared to conventional laparsocopy is self-evident without any doubt. SIL has already passed the learning curve and is routinely utilized in expert centers. This minimized approach has allowed to enter a new era of surgical management that can not be acceded without a fruitful combination of prudent training, consistent day-to-day work and enthusiastic motivation for technical innovations. Both, basic and novel technical specifics as well as particular procedures are described herein. The focus is on the most important surgical interventions in gastroenterology and aims at reviewing the current literature and shares our experience in a high volume center.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tzanis D, Lainas P, Tranchart H, Pourcher G, Devaquet N, Perlemuter G, Naveau S, Dagher I. Atypical as well as anatomical liver resections are feasible by laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014; 5:580-3. [PMID: 25108073 PMCID: PMC4200877 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2013] [Revised: 10/28/2013] [Accepted: 11/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Liver surgery was one of the last fields to be conquered by laparoscopy, which has become safe and effective, especially for left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) and limited peripheral resections. However, major hepatectomies remain challenging. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery is being employed for an increasing variety of surgical sites and indications. PRESENTATION OF CASE Three patients underwent LESS hepatectomy. A 36-year-old woman had LLS for a 38-mm adenoma, an 85-year-old woman an atypical resection of segment VI for a 12-mm hepatocellular carcinoma and a 41-year-old woman an atypical right anterior resection for a 9 cm symptomatic FNH. Procedures were performed transperitoneally with a single-port device, via a 20-mm or 30-mm incision. Operative times were 110 min for LLS, 100 min for the atypical segment VI resection and 120 min for the atypical right anterior liver resection. Blood loss was less than 50 ml in the first two patients and 150 ml in the third. Postoperative courses were uneventful. The first two patients were discharged on postoperative day 3 and the third on postoperative day 1. DISCUSSION To date, some case reports and series of LESS liver surgery have been published. We performed the reported hepatectomies after a considerable experience in laparoscopic hepatic surgery and after applying the LESS approach to other procedures. Our hepatectomy technique was not modified by the use of the single-port and results were very encouraging. CONCLUSION We believe that in selected patients, both peripheral resections and LLS are feasible by LESS surgery, with good intra-operative and post-operative results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Tzanis
- Department of General Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France; University of Paris-Sud, Orsay F-91405, France
| | - Panagiotis Lainas
- Department of General Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France; University of Paris-Sud, Orsay F-91405, France
| | - Hadrien Tranchart
- Department of General Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France; University of Paris-Sud, Orsay F-91405, France
| | - Guillaume Pourcher
- Department of General Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France; University of Paris-Sud, Orsay F-91405, France
| | - Niaz Devaquet
- Department of General Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France
| | - Gabriel Perlemuter
- University of Paris-Sud, Orsay F-91405, France; Department of Gastroenterology, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France
| | - Sylvie Naveau
- University of Paris-Sud, Orsay F-91405, France; Department of Gastroenterology, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of General Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, AP-HP, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, F-92140 Clamart cedex, France; University of Paris-Sud, Orsay F-91405, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gkegkes ID, Iavazzo C. Single incision laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review. J Minim Access Surg 2014; 10:107-12. [PMID: 25013325 PMCID: PMC4083541 DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.134872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2013] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Single incision laparoscopic surgery is a rather innovative surgical technique. A systematic literature review was performed with the intention to evaluate the till now clinical evidence regarding the application of single incision technique on liver resections as a method of management in hepatic lesions. Twelve relative studies were found in the field including 30 patients with a age range from 29 to 90 years and a body mass index from 20.1 to 36.5 kg/m2. Primary hepatic carcinoma (40%), metastatic nodules (26.7%), hepatic cysts (16.7%), hepatic haemangiomas (13.3%) and hepatic adenoma (3.3%) were the most common indications of the lesions resected. The types of hepatectomy performed included partial hepatectomy (43.3%), segmentectomy (30%) and lobectomy (26.7%). In the majority of the patients, left lateral segments (II-III-IV) (76.7%) were resected. The median operative time was 110 min (range: 55-235) while the median quantity of blood loss was 50 ml (range: 0-100). No conversion to open surgery and no transfusion were needed. The duration of hospital stay ranged between 2 and 11 days. No complications, no cases of disease recurrence or death of patients were reported. None of the studies included described data on the cosmesis of the application of single incision laparoscopic technique on hepatic resections. Moreover, the surgical technique, as well as the different type of ports used is also presented in this review. Single site port laparoscopic surgery is a promising minimally invasive procedure for liver resections.
Collapse
|
12
|
Camps Lasa J, Cugat Andorrà E, Herrero Fonollosa E, García Domingo MI, Sánchez Martínez R, Vargas Pierola H, Rodríguez Campos A. Single-port laparoscopic approach of the left liver: initial experience. Cir Esp 2014; 92:589-94. [PMID: 24999088 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2014] [Revised: 05/11/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New technological advances have enabled the development of single-port laparoscopic surgery. This approach began with cholecystectomy and subsequently with other abdominal surgeries. However, few publications on laparoscopic liver surgery have described the use of complete single-port access. We present our initial experience of a single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between May 2012 and December 2013, 5 single-port laparoscopic hepatectomies were performed: one for benign disease and four for colorectal liver metastases. The lesions were approached through a 3-5 cm right supraumbilical incision using a single-port access device. All the lesions were located in hepatic segments II or III. Four left lateral sectorectomies and one left hepatectomy were performed. RESULTS Median operative time was 135 min. No cases were converted to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery. The oral intake began at 18 h. There were no postoperative complications and no patients required blood transfusion. The median hospital stay was 3 days. The degree of satisfaction was very good in 4 cases and good in one. Patients resumed their normal daily activities at 8 days. DISCUSSION Single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy is safe and feasible in selected cases and may reduce surgical aggression and offer better cosmetic results. Comparative studies are needed to determine the real advantages of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Camps Lasa
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, España.
| | - Esteban Cugat Andorrà
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, España
| | - Eric Herrero Fonollosa
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, España
| | - María Isabel García Domingo
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, España
| | - Raquel Sánchez Martínez
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, España
| | - Harold Vargas Pierola
- Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreática, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, España
| | - Aurora Rodríguez Campos
- Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, España
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Belli G, Limongelli P, Belli A, Russo G, D’Agostino A. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Cirrhotic Patients. Updates Surg 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2664-3_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
14
|
Initial experience in single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection: indications, potential benefits, and limitations. HPB SURGERY : A WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATIC, PANCREATIC AND BILIARY SURGERY 2012; 2012:921973. [PMID: 23082044 PMCID: PMC3463174 DOI: 10.1155/2012/921973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2012] [Accepted: 08/09/2012] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic liver resection (SITLLR) has been recently described in limited series. We report our experience in SITLLR and discuss the future of this approach in terms of indications, potential benefits, and limitations, with a special reference to laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Patients and Methods. Six patients underwent SITLLR. Indications were biliary cysts (3 cases), hydatid cysts (2), and colorectal liver metastasis (1). Procedures consisted in cysts unroofing, left lateral lobectomy, pericystectomy, and wedge resection. SITLLR was performed with 11 mm reusable trocar, 10 or 5 mm 30° scopes, 10 mm ultrasound probe, curved reusable instruments, and straight disposable bipolar shears. Results. Neither conversion to open surgery nor insertion of supplementary trocars was necessary. Median laparoscopic time was 105.5 minutes and median blood loss 275 mL. Median final umbilical scar length was 1.5 cm, and median length of stay was 4 days. No early or late complications occurred. Conclusion. SITLLR remains a challenging procedure. It is feasible in highly selected patients, requiring experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery and skills in single-incision laparoscopy. Apart from cosmetic benefit, our experience and literature review did not show significant advantages if compared with multiport LLR, underlying that specific indications remain to be established.
Collapse
|