Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
- Total Article Views (9084)
All Articles published online
|
Featured Article
|
Publishing Process of This Article
|
Aug 14, 2015 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN
1007-9327
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
| For: | Berkelmans GH, Kouwenhoven EA, Smeets BJ, Weijs TJ, Silva Corten LC, van Det MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Luyer MD. Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(30): 9118-9125 [PMID: 26290638 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9118] |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i30/9118.htm |
| Number | Citing Articles |
| 1 |
Lucas Goense, Peter S.N. van Rossum, Teus J. Weijs, Marc J. van Det, Grard A. Nieuwenhuijzen, Misha D. Luyer, Maarten S. van Leeuwen, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P. Ruurda, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven. Aortic Calcification Increases the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2016; 102(1): 247 doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.093
|
| 2 |
B Jiang, V P Ho, J Ginsberg, S J Fu, Y Perry, L Argote-Greene, P A Linden, C W Towe. Decision analysis supports the use of drain amylase-based enhanced recovery method after esophagectomy. Diseases of the Esophagus 2018; 31(10) doi: 10.1093/dote/doy041
|
| 3 |
Amyt Horn, Ahmad Assalia, Sa’d Sayida, Ahmad Mahajna. Amylase Is Not a Useful Indicator for Leakage Detection Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study. Surgical Innovation 2022; 29(1): 44 doi: 10.1177/15533506211027830
|
| 4 |
Merel Lubbers, Marc J. van Det, Mariska J. Kreuger, Ronald Hoekstra, Ellen M. Hendriksen, Marloes Vermeer, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Long‐term oncologic outcomes. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2018; 117(4): 651 doi: 10.1002/jso.24935
|
| 5 |
Chuan Gao, Gang Xu, Changyong Wang, Dong Wang. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2019; 14(1) doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0864-4
|
| 6 |
Lucas Goense, Peter S.N. van Rossum, Daniela Kandioler, Jelle P. Ruurda, Khean‐Lee Goh, Misha D. Luyer, Mark J. Krasna, Richard van Hillegersberg. Stage‐directed individualized therapy in esophageal cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2016; 1381(1): 50 doi: 10.1111/nyas.13113
|
| 7 |
Daniel L. Miller, Gerald A. Helms, William R. Mayfield. Evaluation of Esophageal Anastomotic Integrity With Serial Pleural Amylase Levels. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2018; 105(1): 200 doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.07.053
|
| 8 |
Mohamed Ali Hassan, Lars Bo Svendsen, Morten Thorsteinsson. Association between bacterial growth in chest tube and anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection: prospective cohort study. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2022; 407(8): 3407 doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02700-8
|
| 9 |
Donald E. Low, William Allum, Giovanni De Manzoni, Lorenzo Ferri, Arul Immanuel, MadhanKumar Kuppusamy, Simon Law, Mats Lindblad, Nick Maynard, Joseph Neal, C. S. Pramesh, Mike Scott, B. Mark Smithers, Valérie Addor, Olle Ljungqvist. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World Journal of Surgery 2019; 43(2): 299 doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4
|
| 10 |
Duncan Muir, Stefan Antonowicz, Jack Whiting, Donald Low, Nick Maynard. Implementation of the Esophagectomy Complication Consensus Group definitions: the benefits of speaking the same language. Diseases of the Esophagus 2022; 35(11) doi: 10.1093/dote/doac022
|
| 11 |
Philip A. Linden, Christopher W. Towe, Stephanie G. Worrell, Boxiang Jiang, Vanessa P. Ho, Luis Argote-Greene, Katelynn Bachman, Yaron Perry. Drain Amylase: A Simple and Versatile Method of Detecting Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2022; 113(6): 1794 doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.062
|
| 12 |
Cornelis Maarten de Mooij, Martijn Maassen van den Brink, Audrey Merry, Thais Tweed, Jan Stoot. Systematic Review of the Role of Biomarkers in Predicting Anastomotic Leakage Following Gastroesophageal Cancer Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2019; 8(11): 2005 doi: 10.3390/jcm8112005
|
| 13 |
Sanne K. Stuart, Toon J. L. Kuypers, Ingrid S. Martijnse, Joos Heisterkamp, Robert A. Matthijsen. C-reactive protein and drain amylase: their utility in ruling out anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2023; 58(5): 448 doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2141076
|
| 14 |
C. A. De Pasqual, J. Weindelmayer, S. Laiti, R. La Mendola, M. Bencivenga, L. Alberti, S. Giacopuzzi, G. de Manzoni. Perianastomotic drainage in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, does habit affect utility? An 11-year single-center experience. Updates in Surgery 2020; 72(1): 47 doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00674-9
|
| 15 |
Jorn-Jan van de Beld, David Crull, Julia Mikhal, Jeroen Geerdink, Anouk Veldhuis, Mannes Poel, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven. Complication Prediction after Esophagectomy with Machine Learning. Diagnostics 2024; 14(4): 439 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040439
|
| 16 |
Tomohiro Matsumoto, Hirotoshi Kikuchi, Ryoma Haneda, Wataru Soneda, Amane Hirotsu, Sanshiro Kawata, Yoshihiro Hiramatsu, Kinji Kamiya, Yosuke Shibata, Eisaku Okada, Hiroya Takeuchi. Early detection of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy using drain amylase levels. Esophagus 2021; 18(3): 522 doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00827-z
|
| 17 |
Luca Giulini, Attila Dubecz, Norbert Solymosi, Julian Tank, Marcus Renz, Lucas Thumfart, Hubert J. Stein. Prognostic Value of Chest-Tube Amylase Versus C-Reactive Protein as Screening Tool for Detection of Early Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 2019; 29(2): 192 doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0656
|
| 18 |
Robert T. van Kooten, Daan M. Voeten, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Henk H. Hartgrink, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Richard van Hillegersberg, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Michel W. J. M. Wouters. Patient-Related Prognostic Factors for Anastomotic Leakage, Major Complications, and Short-Term Mortality Following Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2022; 29(2): 1358 doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10734-3
|
| 19 |
Igor Braga RIBEIRO, Martinho Antonio GESTIC, Murillo Pimentel UTRINI, Felipe David Mendonça CHAIM, Elinton Adami CHAIM, Everton CAZZO. DRAIN AMYLASE LEVELS MAY INDICATE GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY LEAKS AFTER ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia 2018; 55(1): 66 doi: 10.1590/s0004-2803.201800000-13
|
| 20 |
Antonio Barbaro, Thomas A Eldredge, Jonathan Shenfine. Diagnosing anastomotic leak post-esophagectomy: a systematic review. Diseases of the Esophagus 2021; 34(2) doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa076
|
| 21 |
Koceila Amroun, Sophie Deguelte, Zoubir Djerada, Laurent Ramont, Cyril Perrenot, Linda Rached, Yohan Renard, Rami Rhaiem, Reza Kianmanesh. High amylase concentration in drainage liquid can early predict proximal and distal intestinal anastomotic leakages: A prospective observational study. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2023; 28(1): 5 doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_273_21
|
| 22 |
AbhayK Kattepur, NizamudheenM Pareekutty, JohnJ Alapatt, Satheesan Balasubramanian. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis after esophagectomy: A nail in the coffin?. Journal of Current Oncology 2019; 2(2): 84 doi: 10.4103/jco.jco_15_19
|
| 23 |
Shizuki Sugita, Kazushi Miyata, Daisuke Shimizu, Tomoki Ebata, Yukihiro Yokoyama. A risk scoring system for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2023; 53(10): 936 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad072
|
| 24 |
Erika Andreatta, Alberto Buogo, Emanuele Asti, Sara Boveri, Luigi Bonavina. Comparison of pleural drain amylase and serum C-reactive protein for early detection of intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomotic leaks. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2022; 407(7): 2715 doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02550-4
|
| 25 |
Alexander Bull, Philip H Pucher, Jesper Lagergren, James A Gossage. Chest drainage after oesophageal resection: A systematic review. Diseases of the Esophagus 2022; 35(7) doi: 10.1093/dote/doab069
|
| 26 |
Woo Sik Yu, Joonho Jung, Hyejung Shin, Yunho Roh, Go Eun Byun, Dae Joon Kim, Seokjin Haam, Seong Yong Park. Amylase level in cervical drain fluid and anastomotic leakage after cervical oesophagogastrostomy†. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2019; 56(2): 301 doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz008
|
| 27 |
Judith P.M. Schots, Misha D.P. Luyer, Grard A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen. Abdominal Drainage and Amylase Measurement for Detection of Leakage After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2018; 22(7): 1163 doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3789-7
|