BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in CrossRef
For: Boyapati R, Majumdar A, Robertson M. AIMS65: A promising upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk score but further validation required. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(39): 14515-14516 [PMID: 25339841 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14515]
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i39/14515.htm
Number Citing Articles
1
Marc Nguyen-Tat, Constantin Cornelius, Arthur Hoffman, Achim Tresch, Joerg Krey, Ralf Kiesslich, Peter Robert Galle, Johannes Wilhelm Rey. The Manchester Triage System (MTS): a score for emergency management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleedingZeitschrift für Gastroenterologie 2018; 56(05): 479 doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124194
2
Min Zhong, Wan Jun Chen, Xiao Ye Lu, Jie Qian, Chang Qing Zhu. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational studyJournal of Digestive Diseases 2016; 17(12): 820 doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12433
3
S.F. Zhao, Q.Y. Qu, K. Feng, M.Q. Song. Comparison of the AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford score for risk stratification in elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleedingEuropean Geriatric Medicine 2017; 8(1): 37 doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2016.10.002