BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Huang YN, Xie YY, Li SH, Yu X, Li J. Enhanced niacin skin flushing response in perinatal compared to non-perinatal depression. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(9): 119399 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.119399]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the entire editorial team, reviewers, and production staff of World Journal of Psychiatry for their exceptional professionalism and meticulous attention throughout the entire publication process. The transparent editorial policies, rigorous peer review, and efficient online system demonstrated the journal’s strong commitment to scholarly integrity. The reviewers provided insightful and constructive feedback that greatly improved our manuscript, while the language and copy‑editing further enhanced its clarity and presentation. Every step was handled with care, timeliness, and clear communication. We truly appreciate the dedicated efforts of all involved and are honored to have our work published in such a reputable journal. This has been a highly positive experience, and we confidently commend the journal for maintaining the highest academic standards.