Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2015; 3(4): 193-205
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i4.193
Table 1 United States Preventive Services Task Force Quality Rating Criteria (Case-Control study)
Criteria
Accurate ascertainment of cases
Nonbiased selection of cases/controls with exclusion criteria applied equally to both
Response rate
Diagnostic testing procedures applied equally to each group
Measurement of exposure accurate and applied equally to each group
Appropriate attention to potential confounding variable
Definition of ratings based on above criteria
Good: Appropriate ascertainment of cases and nonbiased selection of case and control participants; exclusion criteria applied equally to cases and controls; response rate equal to or greater than 80%; diagnostic procedures and measurements accurate and applied equally to cases and controls; and appropriate attention to confounding variables
Fair: Recent, relevant, without major apparent selection or diagnostic work-up bias but with response rate less than 80% or attention to some but not all important confounding variables
Poor: Major selection or diagnostic work-up biases, response rates less than 50%, or inattention to confounding variables