Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Meta-Anal. Apr 26, 2015; 3(2): 125-132
Published online Apr 26, 2015. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v3.i2.125
Table 2 Summary of cohort, case-cohort studies of red meat consumption and endometrial cancer
Ref.LocationCohortStudydesignPopulationNutrientIntake unitReference yearAdjustment factorsRR (95%CI)
Zheng et al[15]United StatesIowa Women’s Health StudyCohort23070 total 216 casesTotal meatg/dBaselineAge, age at menopause, parity, hormone therapy, total energy intake1.1
Kabat et al[16]CanadaNational Breast Screening StudyCohort426 cases 33722 non-casesRed meatg/dBaselineAge, BMI, menopause, parity, age at menarche, estrogen use, oral contraceptive, total calories, raw vegetable, alcohol intake, physical activity, education0.86 (0.61-1.22)
van Lonkhuijzen et al[6]CanadaCanadian Study of Diet, Lifestyle, and HealthCase-cohort56837 total 221 cases 3697 non-casesRed meatg/dBaselineAge, BMI, age at menarche, number of live birhts, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive, exercise, average calorie, vegetable intake, postmenopausal status, hormone therapy1.62 (0.86-3.08)
Genkinger et al[7]SwedenSwedish Mammography CohortCohort60895 total 720 casesRed meatg/wkBaselineAge, energy, BMI, parity, and education1.06 (0.68-1.66)
Arem et al[17]United StatesNIH-AARP Diet and Health StudyCohort72796 total 966 casesRed meatg/1000 kcalBaselineAge, BMI, smoking, total energy intake, age at menarche, age at first child’s birth, parity, age at menopause, hormone therapy, oral contraceptive, diabetes, physical activity0.91 (0.77-1.08)