Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 18, 2025; 13(2): 100483
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.100483
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.100483
Table 5 Literature excluded from the systematic review (n = 9)
| Ref. | Number of cases | Literature retrieved | Reason for exclusion |
| Cooper et al[114], 1976 | 1 | Abstract | Full text not retrieved |
| Villarejo et al[115], 1980 | 1 | Abstract | Full text not retrieved |
| Kobayashi et al[116], 1987 | 2 | Abstract | Full text not retrieved |
| Albala et al[117], 1989 | 1 | Abstract | Full text not retrieved |
| Celik et al[118], 2005 | 1 | Full text | Incomplete case details |
| Aly et al[119], 2015 | 3 | Full text | Incomplete case details |
| Vagholkar et al[120], 2016 | 1 | Full text | Incomplete case details |
| Montasr[121], 2020 | 1 | Abstract | Incomplete case details |
| Wu et al[122], 2024 | 1 | Abstract | Full text not retrieved |
- Citation: Ghritlaharey RK. Why the migration of peritoneal shunt catheter into the scrotum occurs more in children: A systematic literature review. World J Meta-Anal 2025; 13(2): 100483
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v13/i2/100483.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.100483