Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 102609
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.102609
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.102609
Table 3 Comparison of proportion of the subjects categorised based on lung ultrasound score over the period of study
Lung ultrasound score | Score 0 (normal) | Score 1 (well separated B-lines) | Score 2 (coalescent B-lines) | Score 3 (consolidation) | P value | ||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
Baseline (n = 37) | 0 | 0.0 | 15 | 40.5 | 16 | 43.2 | 6 | 16.2% | - |
After trial 1 (n = 37) | 17 | 45.9 | 14 | 37.8 | 6 | 16.2 | 0 | 0.0 | < 0.001 |
After trial 2 (n = 20) | 15 | 75.0 | 4 | 20.0 | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 | < 0.001 |
After trial 3 (n = 5) | 5 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.032 |
- Citation: Anegundi SS, Kurdi MS, Sutagatti JG, Theerth KA. Role of lung ultrasound in assessing positive end expiratory pressure induced lung recruitment in patients on mechanical ventilation. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 102609
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v14/i3/102609.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.102609