Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Pediatr. Sep 9, 2025; 14(3): 103732
Published online Sep 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i3.103732
Table 3 Treatment features and outcomes of primary vs secondary intra-arterial chemotherapy in 17 eyes
IAC features
Primary IAC (n = 9)
Secondary IAC with intravitreal chemotherapy (n = 8)
P value
Total

Median number of cycles1 (1-3)2 (1-3)0.4031.7Mann Whitney U test
Melphalan only211.0003
Melphalan + topotecan6612Fisher’s exact test
Melphalan + topotecan + carboplatin112
Melphalan [median (range)]5 (3-12.5)5 (5-12.5)0.335 (3-12.5)
Topotecan [median (range)]1 (1-3)1 (1-3)11 (1-3)
Carboplatin [median (range)]30 (-)30 (-)-30 (-)
Intravitreal chemotherapy features
Mean number of injections [median (range)]-3 (1-5)-3 (1-5)
Melphalan only [median (range)]-1 (16)1 (16)
Topotecan only [median (range)]-2 (34)2 (34)
Melphalan + topotecan [median (range)]-3 (50)3 (50)
Systemic chemotherapy
Mean number of cycles [median (range)]-8 (6-11)-8 (6-11)
Brachytherapy [median (range)]-11
Outcomes
Follow-up months [median (range)]20 (1-72)28 (10-72)0.38530.17 (1-72)Mann Whitney U test
Tumor control8 (88)7 (88)1.0015 (88)Fisher’s exact test
Tumor control per ICRB
Group B230.725Fisher’s exact
Group C011
Group D213
Group E426
Enucleation per ICRB group
Group B00-0
Group C000
Group D011
Group E101
Visual acuity of salvaged eyesn = 8n = 715
> 6/60 [median (range)]2 (25)2 (28.6)14Fisher’s exact
< 6/60 [median (range)]6 (75)5 (71.4)11