Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2018; 9(11): 262-270
Published online Nov 18, 2018. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i11.262
Table 1 Summary of literature review results
Study nameStudy typeNo. of PatientsProcedures doneFindings/results/conclusions
Wyatt et al[8]Retrospective Review40810Diagnostic arthroscopy, joint debridement, synovectomy, partial or complete meniscectomy, meniscus repair, microfracture, and lateral retinacular releaseNo significant difference in infection rates between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups
Bert et al[7]Retrospective Review3231Arthroscopic meniscectomy, arthroscopic meniscal repair, loose body removal, lateral retinacular release, and arthroscopic debridementNo significant difference in infection rates between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups
Qi et al[17]Retrospective Review1326Arthroscopic diagnosis, debridement, partial or complete meniscectomy, arthroscopic shaving and microfracture, removal of loose bodies, synovectomy and lateral retinacular releaseNo significant difference in infection rates between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups
Ghnmait et al[15]Randomized control trial180Diagnostic arthroscopy, meniscus repairNo significant difference in infection rates between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups
Rose et al[12]Retrospective Review302Meniscectomies, arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic meniscal repair, arthroscopic shaving and microfracture, removal of loose bodies, arthroscopic synovectomy, arthroscopic lateral retinacular release and diagnostic arthroscopicNo significant difference in infection rates between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups
Wieck et al[16]Randomized control trial437Unspecified arthroscopyNo significant difference in infection rates between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups
Phegan et al[18]Retrospective Review1585ACL reconstruction with graftVancomycin soaked grafts have a lower infection rate than non-soaked grafts
Vertullo et al[19]Retrospective Review1135ACL reconstruction with graftVancomycin soaked grafts have a lower infection rate than non-soaked grafts
Pérez-Prieto et al[22]Retrospective Review1544ACL reconstruction with graftVancomycin soaked grafts have a lower infection rate than non-soaked grafts
Yazdi et al[31]Randomized control trial360ACL reconstruction with graftUsing gentamicin in irrigating solutions during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction surgery does not statistically decrease post-operation septic arthritis
Formaini et al[10]Retrospective Review2330Unspecified arthroscopyNo significant difference in infection rates between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups
Armstrong et al[11]Retrospective Review4256Unspecified arthroscopyInfection following knee arthroscopy was associated with prolonged operation time and corticosteroid use, not presence or absence of prophylactic antibiotics
D'Angelo and Ogilvie-Harris[26]Retrospective Review9Unspecified arthroscopyAntibiotic prophylaxis may reduce hospital costs by reducing spending on treating septic arthritis based on a 9 case review of patients with septic arthritis following arthroscopy
Babcock et al[23]Retrospective Review27Unspecified arthroscopyIn a case series review of septic arthitis patients, shaving and corticosteriods were found to be significant risk factors, but not antibiotics
Lubowitz et al[25]Review ArticleNANAThere is not enough evidence to conclude whether or not antibiotics should be administered prophylactically in knee arthroscopy. However, the results of articles like Bert et al should be further examined and studied
Kurzweill[27]Review ArticleNANAThere is not enough evidence to conclude whether or not antibiotics should be administered prophylactically in knee arthroscopy. However, they should still be used as a measure to reduce the risk of post procedure infection
Onyema et al[24]Review ArticleNANAProphylactic antibiotics should not be used for knee arthroscopy
Prokuski[6]Review ArticleNANACephalosporins are the drug of choice for most orthopedic surgeries. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their efficacy in arthroscopic surgery
Müller-Rath et al [9]Survey110 physiciansNA62 % of the surgeons reported the use of an antibiotic prophylaxis in every arthroscopic case, while 19 % administer antibiotics only occasionally
Mini et al [13]Survey166 hospitalsNA57.1% of orthopedic surgeons routinely use antibiotic prophylaxis for arthroscopy
Table 2 Comparison of infection rates in simple arthroscopy patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics
Study nameTotal patientsPatients receiving antibioticsPatients not receiving antibioticsNo. of septic arthritis cases: Antibiotic groupNo. of septic arthritis cases: No antibiotic groupSeptic arthritis: Antibiotic group (%)Septic arthritis rate: No antibiotic group (%)P valuea
Wyatt et al[8]4081032836797425110.080.14
Bert et al[7]27809331847130.150.16
Qi et al[17]1326614712110.160.14
Ghnmait et al[15]18090900000
Rose et al[12]302142880100.35
Total45398344871091127160.080.150.05
Table 3 Comparison of infection rates in simple arthroscopy patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics, excluding bony procedures
Study nameTotal patientsPatients receiving antibioticsPatients not receiving antibioticsNo. of septic arthritis cases: Antibiotic groupNo. of septic arthritis cases: No antibiotic groupSeptic arthritis rate: Antibiotic group (%)Septic arthritis rate: No antibiotic group (%)P valuea
Bert et al[7]27809331847130.110.16
Ghnmait et al[15]18090900000
Total296010231937130.10.150.69
Table 4 Comparison of infection rates in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with vs without vancomycin graft soaking
Study nameTotal patientsIV prophylaxis aloneIV prophylaxis + vancomycinNumber infected IV aloneNumber infected IV + vancomycinInfection rate IV alone (%)Infection rate IV + vancomycin (%)P valuea
Phegan et al[18]15852851300401.40
Pérez-Prieto et al[22]15448107341501.850
Total3129109520341901.740< 0.001