Prior leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty patients causes greater implant complications and faster time to revision

doi:10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.109885

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 8

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (532)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

165

Figures (1-2)

Tables (1-4)

Sum=272

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

125

Sum=167

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=79

Aug 18, 2025 (publication date) through Aug 19, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2025; 16(8): 109885
Published online Aug 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.109885

Table 3 Medical and healthcare utilization between total hip arthroplasty patients with leg length discrepancy and a matched-control cohort

Utilization	Leg length discrepancy	Control	OR	95%CI	P value
Readmission (%)	7.75	7.02	1.11	0.93-1.33	0.244
Length of stay (day)	3.1 ± 3.4	2.8 ± 2.6			0.034

OR: Odds ratio; 95%CI: 95%confidence interval.

Citation: Rodriguez HC, Mekkawy KL, Rust BD, Yergler TO, Corces A, Roche MW, Gupta A. Prior leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty patients causes greater implant complications and faster time to revision. World J Orthop 2025; 16(8): 109885
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i8/109885.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.109885