Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2025; 16(7): 106281
Published online Jul 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281
Published online Jul 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281
Table 4 Cumulative percent revision rates for Truliant cruciate retaining compared to aggregate cruciate retaining
Years to revision | Cumulative percent revision % (number at risk) | |
Truliant CR (n = 653) | Aggregate CR (n = 537840) | |
0 | 0.01 (653) | 0.02 (536733) |
1 | 0.18 (544) | 0.57 (486846) |
2 | 0.31 (398) | 0.95 (420494) |
3 | 0.39 (208) | 1.2 (360904) |
4 | 0.44 (351) | 1.37 (290143) |
5 | 0.48 (11) | 1.51 (216888) |
6 | 0.52 (11) | 1.60 (147845) |
7 | 0.54 (11) | 1.67 (89727) |
8 | 0.56 (11) | 1.73 (45593) |
9 | 0.56 (01) | 1.75 (17960) |
- Citation: Jones K, Muehlmann AM, Musgrave M, Penrose CT. Short-term survivorship of Truliant® total knee arthroplasty implants utilizing the American Joint Replacement Registry. World J Orthop 2025; 16(7): 106281
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i7/106281.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106281