Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2025; 16(6): 103875
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103875
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103875
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative functional scores between the two groups, mean ± SD
Characteristic | Conventional group (n = 28) | Transposition group (n = 25) | P value |
ASES scores | |||
1 year postoperatively | 63.29 ± 4.21 | 73.40 ± 5.91 | < 0.001a |
Final follow-up | 78.96 ± 5.02 | 79.92 ± 4.59 | 0.474 |
Constant-Murley scores | |||
1 year postoperatively | 58.04 ± 8.43 | 67.31 ± 6.56 | < 0.001a |
Final follow-up | 78.86 ± 7.55 | 80.56 ± 4.06 | 0.305 |
- Citation: Zhou YJ, Wang BB, Wen HW, Xu L, Feng J, Xu FS. Clinical comparison of arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with or without long head of biceps tendon transposition. World J Orthop 2025; 16(6): 103875
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i6/103875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103875