Fibula fractures management

doi:10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.254

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 5

This Article

(233)

(253)

(0)

(15)

(1)

(31671)

(30)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

- Full Article with Cover (PDF)
- Full Article (XML)

Review

World J Orthop. May 18, 2021; 12(5): 254-269
Published online May 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.254

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Lateral, mortise and antero-posterior radiographic views of a Danis-Weber type B left distal fibula fracture. Conservative treatment is the correct choice for this case because minimal displacement of the fracture and absence of associated ankle instability are demonstrated.

Citation: Canton G, Sborgia A, Maritan G, Fattori R, Roman F, Tomic M, Morandi MM, Murena L. Fibula fractures management. World J Orthop 2021; 12(5): 254-269
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i5/254.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.254

Canton G, Sborgia A, Maritan G, Fattori R, Roman F, Tomic M, Morandi MM, Murena L. Fibula fractures management. World J Orthop 2021; 12(5): 254-269 [PMID: 34055584 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.254]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.