©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2020; 11(3): 167-176
Published online Mar 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i3.167
Published online Mar 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i3.167
Table 1 Baseline data
| Count (valid percent) | Mean (range) | |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 57 (49) | |
| Female | 59 (51) | |
| Age at operation (yr) | 73 (39-95) | |
| ASA | ||
| 1 | 21 (20) | |
| 2 | 54 (51) | |
| 3 | 31 (30) | |
| 4 and 5 | 0 | |
| Missing data | 10 | |
| Cause for revision | ||
| Aseptic loosening | 80 (69) | |
| Periprosthetic fracture | 17 (15) | |
| Infection | 14 (12) | |
| Other | 5 (4) | |
| Missing data | 2 | |
| Revised stem | ||
| BiMetric | 38 (32) | |
| Spotorno | 20 (17) | |
| Lubinus | 22 (19) | |
| Spectron | 7 (6) | |
| Corail | 6 (5) | |
| Taperloc | 2 (2) | |
| Scanhip | 2 (2) | |
| Müller | 4 (3) | |
| Girdlestone | 4 (3) | |
| Osteostynthesis | 3 (3) | |
| Other | 7 (6) | |
| Missing data | 1 | |
| Cemented | 72 (62) | |
| Not cemented | 44 (38) |
- Citation: Dyreborg K, Petersen MM, Balle SS, Kjersgaard AG, Solgaard S. Observational study of a new modular femoral revision system. World J Orthop 2020; 11(3): 167-176
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i3/167.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i3.167