Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2013; 5(8): 285-294
Published online Aug 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285
Published online Aug 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285
Characteristic | 1.5 Tesla | 3.0 Tesla | P value |
Imaged patients | 98 | 136 | |
Benign | 25 (26) | 30 (22) | 0.20 |
High-risk | 13 (13) | 12 (9) | 1.00 |
Malignant | 14 (14) | 33 (24) | 0.07 |
Multifocal | 9 (9) | 22 (16) | 0.17 |
Multicentric | 4 (4) | 9 (7) | 0.57 |
Ipsilateral | 13 (13) | 31 (23) | 0.09 |
Contralateral | 3 (3) | 7 (5) | 0.53 |
Biopsied patients | 52 (53) | 75 (55) | 0.79 |
Benign | 25 (48) | 30 (40) | 0.47 |
High-risk | 13 (25) | 12 (16) | 0.26 |
Malignant | 14 (27) | 33 (44) | 0.06 |
Multifocal | 9 (17) | 22 (29) | 0.14 |
Multicentric | 4 (8) | 9 (12) | 0.56 |
Ipsilateral | 13 (25) | 31 (41) | 0.06 |
Contralateral | 3 (6) | 7 (9) | 0.52 |
PPV of abnormal MRI | 14/52 (27) | 33/75 (44) | 0.06 |
- Citation: Butler RS, Chen C, Vashi R, Hooley RJ, Philpotts LE. 3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. World J Radiol 2013; 5(8): 285-294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i8/285.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285