©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2011; 3(11): 256-265
Published online Nov 28, 2011. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v3.i11.256
Published online Nov 28, 2011. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v3.i11.256
Table 2 Radiation dose, scanning parameters, and diagnostic performances of computed tomography examination using low dose protocols in urolithiasis
| Authors | Yr | Low dose CT protocols | Diagnostic performance | Effective dose (mSv) | ||||||
| CT scanner | kVp | mA (mAs) | Pitch | S.T. (mm) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | |||
| Liu et al[7] | 2000 | SDCT | 120 | (280) | 2 | 7 | 97 | 96 | 97 | 2.8 |
| Meagher et al[8] | 2001 | SDCT, 4MDCT | 120-130 | 63-130 | 1.4-1.8 | 5 | 93 | NA | NA | 3.5 (2.8-4.5) |
| Hamm et al[9] | 2002 | 4MDCT | 120 | 70 | 2 | 5 | 96 | 97 | NA | 1.5 |
| Heneghan et al[10] | 2003 | SDCT | 140 | 100 (76) | 1.5 | 5 | NA | NA | 90-94 | 6.4 |
| 4MDCT | 0.75 | 11 | ||||||||
| Tack et al[11] | 2003 | 4MDCT | 120 | (30) | 1.5 | 3 | 90-95 | 94-100 | 93-98 | 1.2-1.9 |
| Knöpfle et al[12] | 2003 | 4MDCT | 120 | 70 | 2 | 5 | 98 | 97 | NA | 0.97 (male)/ 1.35 (female) |
| Kluner et al[13] | 2006 | 16MDCT | 120 | 20 (6.9) | 1.43 | 5 | 97 | 95 | NA | 0.5-0.7 |
| Poletti et al[14] | 2007 | 4MDCT | 120 | 74 (30) | 1.25 | 5 | 86-96 | 97-100 | NA | NA |
- Citation: Sung MK, Singh S, Kalra MK. Current status of low dose multi-detector CT in the urinary tract. World J Radiol 2011; 3(11): 256-265
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v3/i11/256.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v3.i11.256