Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2025; 17(6): 108247
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.108247
Table 1 Comparison of clinical information and imaging features in patients with dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma and those with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Variable
Training set
Testing set
P value
t/z or χ2
P value
t/z or χ2
P value
Sex0.7240.3950.0470.8280.592
Age-2.6280.010-0.1970.8450.676
TBIL0.4580.6470.0660.9470.500
ALT0.4090.683-0.1040.9170.322
AST-2.6370.008-0.7170.4740.254
ALB-1.0130.313-0.9130.3660.763
AFP26.780.00016.5440.0000.758
PLT-0.6770.499-0.4050.6850.083
HBV12.5100.000 2.4220.1200.480
Cirrhosis19.2790.000 3.8780.0490.270
MTD0.6520.5150.0380.9700.750
Margin7.9780.005 0.0070.9310.190
Shape0.8620.3534.5610.0330.128
Dense0.5470.4590.4760.4900.089
Cholangiectasis5.8720.0150.1580.6910.592
Artery within tumor0.2500.6170.0110.9180.376
Nonrim APHE8.8010.0032.4220.1190.311
Nonperipheral washout21.5240.0002.3540.1250.705
Halo sign1.7870.1812.1910.1390.612
Capsule2.4330.2961.8860.3890.879
Cystoid variation and necrosis0.3580.5493.3620.0670.793
Peritumoral enhancement8.9470.0039.4770.0020.730