BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2025; 17(6): 108247
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.108247
Table 1 Comparison of clinical information and imaging features in patients with dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma and those with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Variable
Training set
Testing set
P value
t/z or χ2
P value
t/z or χ2
P value
Sex0.7240.3950.0470.8280.592
Age-2.6280.010-0.1970.8450.676
TBIL0.4580.6470.0660.9470.500
ALT0.4090.683-0.1040.9170.322
AST-2.6370.008-0.7170.4740.254
ALB-1.0130.313-0.9130.3660.763
AFP26.780.00016.5440.0000.758
PLT-0.6770.499-0.4050.6850.083
HBV12.5100.000 2.4220.1200.480
Cirrhosis19.2790.000 3.8780.0490.270
MTD0.6520.5150.0380.9700.750
Margin7.9780.005 0.0070.9310.190
Shape0.8620.3534.5610.0330.128
Dense0.5470.4590.4760.4900.089
Cholangiectasis5.8720.0150.1580.6910.592
Artery within tumor0.2500.6170.0110.9180.376
Nonrim APHE8.8010.0032.4220.1190.311
Nonperipheral washout21.5240.0002.3540.1250.705
Halo sign1.7870.1812.1910.1390.612
Capsule2.4330.2961.8860.3890.879
Cystoid variation and necrosis0.3580.5493.3620.0670.793
Peritumoral enhancement8.9470.0039.4770.0020.730


Write to the Help Desk