Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2025; 17(6): 105728
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.105728
Published online Jun 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.105728
Table 1 Stopping power ratio training and testing root mean square errors (%) using reference ρ e as presented in Chika[20]
SPR training RMSE (%) | Total | Lung | Soft | Bone | Testing RMSE (%) | Total | Soft | Bone |
SPR1,1 continuous | 0.32 | 0.70 | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.62 | |
SPR1,1 piece-wise | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.92 | 1.09 | 0.61 | |
SPR0,3 continuous | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.62 | |
Kanematsu | 2.03 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.04 | 1.77 | 1.80 | 1.63 |
- Citation: Chika CE. Advances in dual energy computed tomography approach for proton stopping power ratio computation in radiotherapy. World J Radiol 2025; 17(6): 105728
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i6/105728.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i6.105728