Early mobilization in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review

Table 2 Observational studies methodological quality appraisal (Newcastle Ottawa Scale)

Ref.	Selection				Comparability		Exposure			Score
	Representa-tiveness of the exposed cohort	Selection of the non-exposed cohort	Ascertain-ment of exposure	Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study	Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design	Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the analysis	Assessment of outcome	Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur	Adequacy of follow up of cohorts
Abrams et al[30]	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	6
Abrams et al[2]	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	6
Braune et al[26]	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	4
Ko et al[27]	1	0	0	1	1	0	1	1	1	6
Mayer et al[28]	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	6
Munshi et al[13]	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	1	1	5
Pasrija et al[29]	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	6
Wells et al[35]	1	0	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	6

0: Indicates that the criterion has not been met; 1: Indicates that the criterion has been met; Scoring algorithm: (1) ≥ 7 points are considered as good; (2) 2-6 points are considered as fair; and (3) ≤ 1 point is considered as poor quality.