Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2025; 17(6): 106445
Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i6.106445
Table 6 Coronary angiography findings, n (%)
Parameter
n = 91
LMNormal86 (94.51)
Significant lesion4 (4.4)
Total occlusion (dissection)1 (1.1)
LADNormal20 (21.98)
Significant lesion23 (25.28)
Non-significant lesion12 (13.19)
Total occlusion18 (19.78)
Subtotal occlusion9 (9.89)
Thrombus4 (4.39)
Bridge3 (3.3)
Total D12 (2.2)
LCXNormal51 (56.04)
Significant lesion16 (17.58)
Non-significant lesion18 (19.78)
Total occlusion3 (3.3)
Subtotal occlusion2 (2.2)
Dissection1 (1.1)
RCANormal41 (45.05)
Significant lesion11 (12.09)
Non-significant lesion20 (21.98)
Total occlusion9 (9.89)
Subtotal occlusion8 (8.79)
Thrombus2 (2.2)
RamusNormal86 (94.51)
Significant lesion1 (1.1)
Non-significant lesion4 (4.4)
n = 79
Culprit arteryLAD51 (56.04)
RCA17 (18.68)
LCX11 (12.09)
n = 84
Frequency of affected vesselsSingle vessel disease66 (72.53)
Two vessel disease8 (8.79)
Three vessel disease5 (5.49)
LM + three vessel disease4 (4.4)
LM + two vessel disease1(1.1)