Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2025; 17(6): 105452
Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i6.105452
Table 2 Characteristics of study population, n (%)
Ref.
Location
Study design
Cohort
Sample size
Mean/median age (years)
Median follow-up (years)
Male participants
Hypertension
Hyperlipidemia
DM
Obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2)
History of myocardial infarction
Smoking
Adiponectin cut offs
Outcomes reported (ACM, MACE)
Multivariable regression analysis was adjusted for which variables/confounders
Marino et al[15], 2018NetherlandsProspectiveTotal: 570, ACS: 309, SAP: 261261N/A1203 (77.8)161(61.70)Hypercholesterolemia: 180 (69)59 (22.60)N/AN/A49 (18.8)In ACS patients-median IQR: 2.9 (1.8-4.1 μg/mL) μg/mL. In SAP patients-median IQR: 2.9 (1.9-3.9 μg/mL) μg/mLACM adjusted OR/HR = 8.48 (0.92-78.03), MACE adjusted OR/HR = 1.33 (0.41-4.28)ACS and SAP-adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, and CRP. Additionally, adjusted for indication for coronary angiography in the total cohort
Pratesi et al[16], 2016ItalyProspectiveStable CAD13869.3 ± 10.43.8122 (89.7)98 (71)99 (71.70)61 (42.20)Mean level of BMI was 26.8 kg/m2 ± 4.1 kg/m2114 (82.60)91 (65.94)13.2 ng/mLACM adjusted OR/HR = 11.31 (2.89-44.28)Model 1 (ACM), age, gender, BMI, Inflammatory Disease Score, previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease, NYHA class, EF, hemoglobin, NT-proBNP, eGFR. Model 2 (cardiovascular hospitalisation rate): age, gender, BMI, smoking, NYHA class, hemoglobin, NT-proBNP, EF
Hascoet et al[14], 2013FranceProspectiveStable CAD71560.2 ± 88.1715 (100)44.60%64.90%24.8%N/AN/A82.50%9.1 μg/mLACM adjusted OR/HR = 1.71 (1.16-2.52)Diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension, systolic blood pressure, resting heart rate, tobacco consumption, hsCRP, HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein (a), ankle-arm index, and physical activity
Beatty et al[13], 2012United StatesProspectiveStable ischemic heart disease98164 ± 10.5, 64.9 ± 10.2, 67.6 ± 10.9, 70.5 ± 11.27.1800 (81.5)691N/A259N/AN/AN/ALowest detectable: 145.4 pg/mL. Median: 21.3 μg/mLACM adjusted OR/HR = 1.77 (1.12-2.67)Model 1 adjusts for Demographics (age, sex, race). Model 2 adjusts for model 1 + clinical risk factors (diabetes, eGFR, beta-blocker, aspirin, statin). Model 3 adjusts for model 2 + metabolic markers (BMI, hemogloblin A1c, insulin, glucose, non-HDL cholesterol, HDL, triglycerides). Model 4 adjusts for model 3 + measures of baseline cardiac disease severity (left ventricle ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction, inducible ischemia, log CRP, log NT-proBNP)
Schnabel et al[17], 2008GermanyProspectiveTotal: 1890; stable CAD: 1130; ACS: 7601130632.5906 (80.2)896Total cholesterol: 194; HDL: 48; low density lipoprotein: 121; triglycerides: 129DM: None or diet: 929; oral: 103; insulin: 98N/AN/ANo: 413; past: 523; present: 194Not mentioned but concentrations were similar in patients presenting with SAP [9.03 μg/mL (6.7-13.45 μg/mL)] or ACS [(9.19 μg/mL (6.72-13.15 μg/mL)]MACE adjusted OR/HR = 1.04 (1.008-1.062)Model 1, univariate analysis. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, status, HDL cholesterol family history, ACS (only for total population). Model 3 is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, status, family history, ACS, statins, and beta blocker. Model 4 is adjusted for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, status, family history, statins and beta blocker, BNP, and CRP