Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2025; 17(6): 102722
Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i6.102722
Table 1 Comparison table of noninvasive imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and assessment of sinus of Valsalva aneurysms
Imaging modalities
General information
Strengths
Limitations
TTEThe first imaging modality of choice for diagnosis of SoVAPossess > 90% accuracy for detecting SoVA. It is additionally safe, cost-effective, portable, and more widely availableCan sometimes incorrectly detect rupture site
TEERequired as additional imaging in up to 25% of cases to further characterize the anatomy of the sinuses and their surrounding structuresPossesses better acoustic window and higher resolution, which facilitates more accurate characterization of the aneurysm and its surrounding structuresContraindicated in patients with esophageal disease including known stricture, varices, diverticula, or tumors
ECG-gated MDCTAn acquisition technique that triggers a scan during a particular portion of the cardiac cycleProvides high spatial resolution, elimination of motion artifacts, and improved temporal resolution in the nonemergent setting. Additionally, gated CT’s ability to obtain multiplanar reformations provides superior anatomic delineation and can simultaneously assess the coronary arteriesMore cost prohibitive. Additionally, retrospective ECG gating is needed to assess ventricular function and valvular motion, which carries a high radiation burden
Cardiac MRIPlays an important role in SoVA assessment and is particularly important in the assessment of biventricular functionGold standard imaging technique for SoVA due to its lack of ionizing radiation, better temporal resolution, ability to quantify ventricular function and aortic regurgitant fraction, and provides an assessment of wall motion abnormalitiesMore cost prohibitive