Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2014; 6(4): 130-139
Published online Apr 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i4.130
Myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of stable coronary artery disease
Kohichiro Iwasaki
Kohichiro Iwasaki, Department of Cardiology, Okayama Kyokuto Hospital, Okayama 703-8265, Japan
Author contributions: Iwasaki K contributed to the concept, design, and analysis and interpretation of the data; Iwasaki K also drafted the article, revised it critically for important intellectual content, and approved the final version to be published.
Correspondence to: Kohichiro Iwasaki, MD, Department of Cardiology, Okayama Kyokuto Hospital, 567-1 Kurata, Naka-ku, Okayama 703-8265, Japan. kiwasaki@kyokuto.or.jp
Telephone: +81-86-2763231 Fax: +81-86-2741028
Received: September 2, 2013
Revised: November 16, 2013
Accepted: March 3, 2014
Published online: April 26, 2014
Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that coronary revascularization, especially percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), does not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Many studies using myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) showed that, for patients with moderate to severe ischemia, revascularization is the preferred therapy for survival benefit, whereas for patients with no to mild ischemia, medical therapy is the main choice, and revascularization is associated with increased mortality. There is some evidence that revascularization in patients with no or mild ischemia is likely to result in worsened ischemia, which is associated with increased mortality. Studies using fractional flow reserve (FFR) demonstrate that ischemia-guided PCI is superior to angiography-guided PCI, and the presence of ischemia is the key to decision-making for PCI. Complementary use of noninvasive MPI and invasive FFR would be important to compensate for each method’s limitations. Recent studies of appropriateness criteria showed that, although PCI in the acute setting and coronary bypass surgery are properly performed in most patients, PCI in the non-acute setting is often inappropriate, and stress testing to identify myocardial ischemia is performed in less than half of patients. Also, some studies suggested that revascularization in an inappropriate setting is not associated with improved prognosis. Taken together, the presence and the extent of myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease, and coronary revascularization in the absence of myocardial ischemia is associated with worsened prognosis.

Keywords: Coronary artery bypass surgery, Coronary revascularization, Fractional flow reserve, Myocardial ischemia, Myocardial perfusion imaging, Percutaneous coronary intervention

Core tip: Studies of myocardial perfusion imaging demonstrate that, for patients with moderate to severe ischemia, revascularization is the preferred therapy for survival benefit. For patients with no to mild ischemia, medical therapy is the main choice, and revascularization is associated with increased mortality probably because of worsened ischemia. Studies using fractional flow reserve demonstrate that ischemia-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to angiography-guided PCI, and the presence of ischemia is the key factor in decision-making for PCI. Thus, myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease.