Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2025; 17(6): 106608
Published online Jun 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106608
Table 2 The six best models with optimal machine learning approach and their performance in training and internal validation set
ModelTraining set
Internal-Validation set
Accuracy
AUC (95%CI)
NPV
PPV
Accuracy
AUC (95%CI)
NPV
PPV
The tumor-only model (KNN)0.6900.757 (0.724-0.789)0.5320.7960.7310.750 (0.700-0.801)0.6540.780
The 5 mm peri-tumor model (LightGBM)0.7680.857 (0.824-0.891)0.6290.8600.7460.713 (0.665-0.761)0.5770.854
The 10 mm peri-tumor model (KNN)0.7230.802 (0.776-0.829)0.5480.8390.7760.803 (0.763-0.842)0.5770.902
The tumor-peri-tumor 5 mm model (extreme gradient boosting)0.9350.987 (0.934-1.000)0.8870.9680.7010.774 (0.696-0.853)0.6540.732
The tumor-peri-tumor 10 mm model (logistic regression)0.7810.862 (0.821-0.904)0.7740.7850.7610.841 (0.777-0.904)0.6920.805
The model that incorporates features from all regions—tumor, 5 mm, and 10 mm (LightGBM)0.8320.924 (0.890-0.958)0.7260.9030.7760.899 (0.850-0.948)0.6150.878