Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2025; 17(5): 105872
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.105872
Published online May 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.105872
Figure 6 Decision curve analysis for model comparison across cohorts.
A: In the internal training cohort, the Target Immunotherapy Predictive Model (TIPM) is positioned in the upper right corner of the graph, indicating the highest clinical benefit rate; B: In the internal validation cohort, TIPM’s performance slightly decreased compared to the training cohort but remained in the upper right corner; C: In the external validation cohort, TIPM continued to occupy the upper right corner, demonstrating its robust external generalizability. TIPM: Target Immunotherapy Predictive Model; TNM: Tumor-node-metastasis; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; CNLC: China Liver Cancer; HKLC: Hong Kong Liver Cancer; CRAFITY: C-reactive protein and alpha-fetoprotein in immunotherapy.
- Citation: Tu HB, Feng SY, Chen LH, Huang YJ, Zhang JZ, Peng SY, Lin DL, Ye XJ. Integrating ultrasound and serum indicators for evaluating outcomes of targeted immunotherapy in advanced liver cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(5): 105872
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i5/105872.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i5.105872